期刊文献+

基础设施项目建设风险与价值评估:VfM方法的改进及应用 被引量:5

Risks and Evaluation of Infrastructure: Modification and Application of Vf M
下载PDF
导出
摘要 VfM是对政府与社会资本合作(PPP)项目进行评估的主要方法。基于保险以及未定权益估值方法,对项目现金流的风险进行量化估值,被量化的已识别的项目风险构成项目的真实成本。数据模拟结果表明,改进的"物有所值"法能够确定项目潜在的风险来源并进行风险定价,通过了解这些风险如何影响现金流,能够制定更好的管理决策,保证PPP项目成功实施。 "Value for M oney"is the main evaluation method for Public- Private- Partnership( PPP)project. Based on insurance and contingent valuation method,this paper quantifies the risk valuation of project cash flow,then the quantification of the identified project risk makes up the true cost of the project. Finally,the data simulation show s the improvement of the"Value for M oney "method can determine potential sources of risk and then risk pricing. By understanding these risks how to influence the cash flow,better management decisions can be made and then the value of the project can be improved.
作者 刘穷志 庞泓
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期120-127,共8页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"PPP(公司合作伙伴)中财政资金引导私人资本机制创新研究"(14ZDA029)
关键词 基础设施 物有所值 风险量化 公私合作 infrastructure Value for M oney risk quantification Public-Private-Partnership
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1姜爱华.政府采购“物有所值”制度目标的含义及实现——基于理论与实践的考察[J].财政研究,2014,30(8):72-74. 被引量:31
  • 2刘兵军.传统净现值法的局限性和解决方法[J].商业研究,2003(16):16-17. 被引量:13
  • 3袁竞峰,王帆,李启明,邓小鹏.基础设施PPP项目的VfM评估方法研究及应用[J].现代管理科学,2012(1):27-30. 被引量:74
  • 4BHA1TACHARYA S. 1978. Project valuation with mean -reverting cash flow streams [J]. The Journal of Finance, 33(5) :1317 -1331.
  • 5BLACK F, SCHOLES M. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3) :637 -654.
  • 6MAGNI C A. 2009. Correct or incorrect application of CAPM? Correct or incerrect decisions with CAPM [ J]. European Journal of Operation- al Research, 192(2) :549 -560.
  • 7PINDYCK R S. 1993. Investments of uncertain cost [ J ]. Journal of Finance Economics, 34 ( 1 ) :53 - 76.
  • 8PLATON V, CONSTAANTINESCU A. 2014. Monte Carlo method in risk analysis for investment projects [J]. Procodia Economics and Fi- nance, 15:393 -400.
  • 9PRICE C. 201 I. Optimal rotation with declining discount rate [ J ]. Journal of Forest Economics, 17 (3) :307 -318.
  • 10ROBICHEK A A, MYERS S C. 1966. Conceptual problems in the use of risk -adjusted discount rates [ J]. Journal of Finance, 21 (21) : 727 - 730.

二级参考文献13

  • 1胡伟.西方国家政府采购法中物有所值原则[J].行政与法,2000(5):38-39. 被引量:4
  • 2胡振.PFI的科学内涵及经济效果[J].建筑经济,2005,26(7):49-53. 被引量:15
  • 3张维等译.实物期权[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001.5.
  • 4Heald, D. Value for money tests and ac- counting treatment in PFI schemes. Accounting, Au-diting & Accountability Journal, 2003,16 (3):342- 371.
  • 5中玉玉.PPP/PFI模式的资金价值(VfM)评估方法研究:南京:东南大学,2009.
  • 6Coldrey, 0.(2006). Delivering value for money in government procurement through free trade agreements: a ease study of Australia, Emile Noel Fellows Forum.
  • 7Glendinning, R. (1988) "The Concept of Value for Money", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 1 Iss: 1, pp.42-50.
  • 8Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M.K. (2005). Are Public Private Partnership Value for money? Evaluating al- ternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner view. Accounting Jbrum (29) ,pp.345- 378.
  • 9HM-Treasury. (2003). PFI: meeting the invest- ment challenge. London. Crown copyright 2003.
  • 10Ismail, K., Roshana Takim & Abdul Hadi Nawawi (2012).A Public Sector Comparator (PSC) for Value for Money (VFM) Assessment Tools, www. ccsenet.org/ass Asian Social Science Vol. 8, No. 7.

共引文献110

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部