期刊文献+

病理三维重建研究新辅助化疗后乳腺原发肿瘤的退缩模式 被引量:15

Shrinkage mode of the primary breast tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy analyzed with part-mount sub-serial sectioning and three-dimensional reconstruction technique
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索新辅助化疗后乳腺原发肿瘤的退缩模式。方法将86例ⅡA~ⅢC期乳腺浸润性导管癌患者分别行半疗程(25例)和全疗程(61例)新辅助化疗。新辅助化疗后手术标本制作次连续病理大切片,显微镜下勾画残余肿瘤范围,Photoshop软件配准,3D-Doctor软件三维重建残余肿瘤,评价新辅助化疗后原发肿瘤病理退缩模式。结合病理退缩模式,将临床-病理退缩模式分为向心性退缩(相比新辅助化疗前原发肿瘤最长径,新辅助化疗后残余肿瘤最长径≤2 cm且退缩比率≥50%)和非向心性退缩。结果半疗程组患者中,外科病理完全缓解( pCR)1例,孤立状退缩1例,弥散状退缩23例;全疗程组患者中,外科pCR 18例,孤立状退缩3例,结节状退缩12例,团块伴散在状退缩21例,弥散状退缩7例,差异有统计学意义( P<0.001)。 Logistic多因素分析显示,新辅助化疗前原发肿瘤分期、新辅助化疗后淋巴结降期、新辅助化疗前钼靶恶性钙化灶和孕激素受体( PR)表达为预测临床-病理退缩模式的独立影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论病理组织学三维重建能够全面、立体、直观地展示新辅助化疗后乳腺原发肿瘤的退缩模式。全疗程新辅助化疗前原发肿瘤分期、新辅助化疗后淋巴结降期、PR表达和新辅助化疗前钼靶恶性钙化灶为新辅助化疗后乳腺原发肿瘤临床-病理退缩模式的独立影响因素。 Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the shrinkage mode of the primary tumor in women with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( NAC ) determined by part-mount sub-serial section ( PMSS) and three-dimensional ( 3D) reconstruction technique. Methods Eighty-six women with pathologically proven solitary invasive ductal carcinoma (ⅡA-ⅢC) were recruited. They were divided into two groups. Group A ( n=25) received half cycles of NAC and Group B ( n=61) received whole cycles of NAC. Breast specimen was prepared with PMSS, and residual tumors were microscopically outlined, scanned and registered by Photoshop software. The 3D model of residual tumors was reconstructed with 3D-Doctor software to evaluate the shrinkage mode. Further, the clinicpathologic shrinkage modes were divided into 2 categories:concentric shrinkage mode ( CSM, the longest diameter of the pathological residual tumors was less than 50% and ≤2 cm in comparison with the primary tumor before NAC ) , and non-concentric shrinkage mode ( NCSM, the longest diameter of the pathological residual tumors was more than 50% and/or〉2 cm in comparison with the primary tumor before NAC) . Results Pathological shrinkage modes:Group A: modes Ⅰ,Ⅱ, andⅤwere observed in 1, 1, and 23 cases, respectively;Group B:modesⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ, and Ⅴwere observed in 18, 3, 12, 21, and 7 cases, respectively ( P〈0.001) . The multivariate analysis showed that patients with lower primary tumor stage, PR(-) or mammographic malignant calcification before NAC(-) and lymph nodes down-staging after NAC were more likely to present with CSM after NAC ( P〈0.05 for all). Conclusions The pathologic reconstruction of breast residual tumors can fully and three-dimensionally reveal the shrinkage mode of the primary breast tumor in women with breast cancer after NAC. PMSS and 3D reconstruction of pathology provide a new platform in this area. Primary tumor stage, PR expression and mammographic malignant calcification before NAC and lymph node down-staging after NAC are independent predictors of the clinicopathologic shrinkage mode.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期270-276,共7页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(2011HD012) 山东省科技发展计划(2013YD18030)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 病理学 显微切片术 成像 三维 Breast neoplasms Antineoplastic combined chemotherpay protocols Pathology Microtome sectioning Imaging,three-dimensional reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1CharfareH, LimongelliS, PurushothamAD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(1):14-23. DOI:10.1002/bjs.4840.
  • 2BuchholzTA, LehmanCD, HarrisJR, et al. Statement of the science concerning locoregional treatments after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute conference[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(5):791-797. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0326.
  • 3IshitobiM, OhsumiS, InajiH, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients with operable breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving treatment after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: risk factors of IBTR and validation of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index[J]. Cancer, 2012, 118(18):4385-4393. DOI:10.1002/cncr.27377.
  • 4ChenAM, Meric-BernstamF, HuntKK, et al. Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(12):2303-2312. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2004.09.062.
  • 5GoldhirschA, WinerEP, CoatesAS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013[J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(9):2206-2223. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdt303.
  • 6OgstonKN, MillerID, PayneS, et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival[J]. Breast, 2003, 12(5):320-327. DOI:10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00106-1.
  • 7RouzierR, ExtraJM, CartonM, et al. Primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: incidence and prognostic significance of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(18):3828-3835.
  • 8ThomasJS, JulianHS, GreenRV, et al. Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring[J]. Histopathology, 2007, 51(2):219-226. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02752.x.
  • 9WangS, ZhangY, YangX, et al. Shrink pattern of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its correlation with clinical pathological factors[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2013, 11(1):166. DOI:10.1186/1477-7819-11-166.
  • 10陈述政,王永胜,毛卫波,黄渊,徐少杰,潘颖,潘蕾.局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗后肿瘤退缩模式的病理大切片研究[J].肿瘤学杂志,2011,17(6):444-447. 被引量:7

二级参考文献23

  • 1周丽菲,朱忆凌,黄渊,吕益新.病理大切片制作及其诊断价值[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2006,22(1):100-100. 被引量:4
  • 2Piccart MJ, Kerger J, Tomiak E, et al.Systemic treatment for locally advanced breast cancer:what we still need to learn after a decade of multimodality clinical trials[J].Eur J Cancer, 1992, 28(2-3):667-672.
  • 3Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al.Effect of preopera- tive chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16(8):2672-2685.
  • 4Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al.The effect on tu- mor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide:pre- liminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27 [J].J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21 (22):4165-4 174.
  • 5Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer:significantly enhanced response with docetaxel [J].J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(6): 1456-1466.
  • 6Sachelarie I, Grossbard ML, Chadha M, et al.Primary systemic therapy of breast cancer[J].Oncologist, 2006, 11 (6):574-589.
  • 7Fitzal F, Riedl O, Mittlbfick M, et al.Oncologic safety of breast conserving surgery after tumor downsizing by neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective single centre cohort study [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2011,127(1):121-128.
  • 8Rajan R, Poniecka A, Smith TL, et al.Change in tumor cellularity of breast carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a variable in the pathologic assessment of response[J].Cancer, 2004, 100(7):1365-1373.
  • 9KaufmannM,von MinckwitzG,BearHD,et al.Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer:new perspectives 2006[J].Ann Oncol,2007,18(12):1927-1934.
  • 10KaufmannM,von MinckwitzG,MamounasEP,et al.Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2012,19(5):1508-1516.

共引文献27

同被引文献75

引证文献15

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部