“层累地造成的中国古史说”指谬——兼驳白鸟库吉“抹杀论”和内藤湖南“加上原则”(之二)

On the Mistakes of the Hypothesis of Stratum Accumulation of the Ancient Chinese History as well as Shiratori Kurakichi's Obliteration and Naito Konan's Addition(Part Two)

"层累说""抹杀论"和"加上原则"是中日三大史学巨擘关于华夏上古史相互映衬的重要理论,它们屡遭批驳却至今屹立不倒,长期被学界奉若圭臬。它们只是没有完成论证的假说,不仅违反逻辑学的一些基本准则,还存在着不少的逻辑谬误,仅仅具有想当然的或然性,是在各自选定资料范围内的偶然排列。从实质的历史角度考察,他们论证的史学逻辑也难以成立,根本不具有实际发生的历史可能性。作为"疑古思潮"理论基础的三说既然如此荒谬,那么现在就到了"终结疑古"之时。

The three complementary hypotheses of Gu Jiegang＇s Stratum Accumulation,Shiratori Kurakichi＇s Obliteration and Naito Konan＇s Addition are very popular in the research of the ancient Chinese history.The repeated criticism of them does not shake the authority of the three great historians＇ theories which have been the standards in the historic circle.The analysis of the three hypotheses from the point of view of logic in this dissertation reveals that they are only unproved hypotheses which are not only against the basic logic criteria,but also with many logical fallacies.And the three hypotheses are,respectively,valid only for their specially-collected materials,not for the universal.They are taken for granted,not of necessities.Examined from historic point of view,the logic used in their arguments is fallible,and therefore the three hypotheses can not be proved,and with no possibility.It is high time that we gave up the three absurd hypotheses.