期刊文献+

基于社会资本的企业绿色创新绩效实证研究 被引量:5

An Empirical Study on Green Innovation Performance of Enterprises from the Perspective of Social Capital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 绿色创新是企业发展的必然趋势。然而,目前诸多企业缺乏足够的资源和能力来开展绿色创新,大多数企业采取战略合作的形式以获得互补性资源,绿色知识共享就是其中的一种合作方式。以往的学术研究注重社会资本对于企业创新绩效的影响,本研究在回顾文献的基础上,提出了结构资本、认知资本、关系资本、绿色知识共享及绿色创新绩效之间的结构方程模型,并通过珠三角地区的95家企业的问卷调查验证这一模型。研究结果表明,结构资本与认知资本对关系资本都具有显著的正向影响;认知资本显著影响绿色创新绩效,而结构资本不显著影响绿色创新绩效;绿色知识共享在关系资本和绿色创新绩效间具有部分中介效应。本研究指出,社会资本作为绿色知识交换与集成的重要渠道,以互动关系的形式促进了合作企业间绿色知识的共享。 Green innovation is an irresistible trend of enterprises development. However,' many companies currently lack of adeq- uate resources and capacity to carry out green innovation, most of them initiative strategic cooperation in order to obtain complementary resources, including green knowledge-sharing. Previous research has focused on the influence of social capital on firms innovation performance. This study on the basis of the literature review used equation structural model to analye the relationships among social cap, ital, knowledge sharing and green innovation performance of 95 firms in Pearl river delta. The results suggest that structural capital and cognitive capital have a positive influence on relational capital, knowledge sharing acts as a part mediator between relational capital and green innovation performance; the effect of structural capital and cognitive capital on green innovation performance are non-significant and significant respectively. We also suggest that social capital is an important channel for the green knowledge exchange and integra- tion, social relations interaction of actors promotes the sharing of knowledge among green cooperative enterprises.
作者 钟榴 郑建国
出处 《技术经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期30-35,共6页 Journal of Technical Economics & Management
基金 东华大学博士生创新基金项目(CUSF-DH-D-2015066)
关键词 结构资本 认知资本 关系资本 绿色知识 知识共享 绿色创新 Structural capital Cognitive capital Relational capital Green knowledge Knowledge sharing Green innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Salma Alguezani & Raffacle Filieri. Investigating the role of social capital in innovation: sparse versus dense network [J].Journal of Knowledge Man- agement, 2010,14 (6): 891-909.
  • 2Ahuja, G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a long- itudinal study [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(3):425-455.
  • 3Cousins, P. and Stanwix, E. It's only a matter of confidence: A comparison of relationship management between Japanese and UK non-Japanese-owned vehicle manufacturers [J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2001,21(9/10): 1160-1179.
  • 4Andrew CJnkpen,Eric W.K. Tsang. Social Capital,Networks,and Knowl- edge Transfer [J].Academy of Management Review, 2005,30(1): 146-165.
  • 5Janine Nahapiet,Sumantra Ghosal. Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage [J].Academay of Management Review, 1998, 23(2) : 242-266.
  • 6Coleman,J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capita[ [J].American Journal of Sociology, 1988,94: S95-S 120.
  • 7Fukuyama, F. Trnst:the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity [M]. New York: Free Press, 1995 : 22-34.
  • 8Putnam,R.D. The prosperous community:social capital and public life [J]. American Prospect, 1993,13(1) : 35-42.
  • 9Renzl, B. Trust in management and knowledge sharing:the mediating ef- fects of fear and knowledge documentation [J].Omega-International Jour- nal of Management Science, 2008,36(2) : 206-220.
  • 10Simpson, D., D. Power and D. Samson. Greening the automotive supplychain: A relationship perspective [J].International Joumai of Operations & Production Management, 2007,27(1): 28-48.

二级参考文献36

  • 1Rock G W,Zmud R W,Kim Y G. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing:Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators,social-psychological forces,and organizational climate[J].MIS Quarterly,2005,(01):87-111.
  • 2Holste J S,Fields D. Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2010,(01):128-140.
  • 3Wu W L,Lin C H. Interpersonal trust and knowledge sharing:Moderating effects of individual altruism and a social interaction environment[J].Social Behavior and Personality,2009,(01):83-93.
  • 4Janowiez-Panjaitan M,Noorderhaven N. Trust,calculation,and interorganizational learning of tacit knowledge:An organizational roles perspective[J].Organization Studies,2009,(10):1021-1044.
  • 5Wang S,Noe R A. Knowledge sharing:A review and directions for future research[J].Human Resource Management Review,2010,(02):115-131.
  • 6Lam A,Lambermont-Ford J P. Knowledge sharing in organisational contexts:A motivation-based perspective[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2010,(01):51-66.
  • 7Levin D Z,Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust:The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer[J].Management Science,2004,(11):1477-1490.
  • 8Chow W S,Chan L S. Social network,social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing[J].Information and Management,2008,(07):458-465.
  • 9Zhou S H,Siu F. Effects of social tie content on knowledge transfer[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2010,(03):449-463.doi:10.1108/13673271011050157.
  • 10Burt R S. Structural holes:The social structure of competition[M].Boston,MA:Harvard University Press,1992.

共引文献11

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部