期刊文献+

激光辅助孵化对胚胎移植妊娠结局影响的Meta分析 被引量:7

Impact of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcome: a Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探究激光辅助孵化(LAH)对行胚胎移植不孕患者妊娠结局的影响。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Ovid SP、Medline、Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、万方和维普等数据库,纳入LAH与其他多种辅助孵化方法和不作任何处理组比较的随机对照试验(RCT),检索年限截至2015年10月,语言不限,按照Cochrane协作组建议对纳入文献行质量评价和异质性分析,数据分析采用Rev Man 5.3.5软件。结果:纳入25个RCT;激光组分别与酸化组、机械组和对照组(不作任何处理)进行比较,继续妊娠率、流产率、活产率等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);对选择行冻融胚胎移植(FET)的患者,激光组较对照组有较高的种植率及临床妊娠率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.000 01;P<0.05);但多胎率显著增加(P<0.05)。结论:对选择行FET的患者,LAH较不做任何处理更有优势,可以提高种植率和临床妊娠率,值得推广及应用,但LAH会增加多胎发生的风险。 Objective: To evaluate the impact of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on pregnancy outcome of infertile patients. Methods: Well-known databases at home and abroad were searched, then randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the impact of LAH and non-LAH on pregnancy outcome were analyzed. Quality and heterogeneity of the articles were screened, and then relative risk (RR) was served as effective size to merge the studies. Results: Twenty-five relevant RCTs studies were included. There were no significant differences in the ongoing pregnancy rate, the miscarriage rate and the live birth rate (P〉0.05). But for the frozen-thawed embryo of patients, LAH group could significantly improve the implantation rate and the clinical pregnancy rate (P〈0.000 01; P〈0.05) compared with control group. In addition, LAH can increase the incidence of multiple pregnancies (P〈0.05). Conclusion: For the frozen-thawed embryo of patients, LAH was worthy to be popularized and applied and LAH can increase the incidence of multiple pregnancies.
出处 《生殖与避孕》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期288-298,共11页 Reproduction and Contraception
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81401254) 广州市教育局资助项目(No.1201430205)
关键词 激光辅助孵化(LAH) 妊娠 种植率 临床妊娠率 META分析 laser-assisted hatching (LAH) pregnancy implantation rate clinical pregnancy rate Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, et al. Implantation failures: success of assisted hatching with quarter-laser zona thinning. Reprod Biomed Online, 2005, 10(2):224-9.
  • 2Hammadeh ME, Fischer-Hammadeh C, Ali KR. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: a state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2011, 28(2):119-28.
  • 3Ren X, Liu Q, Chen W, et al. Effect of the site of assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2013, 30(5):691-7.
  • 4Balaban B, Urman B, Alatas C, et al. A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching. Hum Reprod, 2002, 17(5): 1239-43.
  • 5Balaban B. Laser-assisted hatching increases pregnancy and implantation rates in eryopreserved embryos that were allowed to cleave in vitro after thawing: a prospective random- ized study. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(8):2136-40.
  • 6Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, et al. Effect of laser zona pellucida opening on clinical outcome of assisted reproduction technology in patients with advanced female age, recurrent implantation failure, or frozen-thawed embryos. Fertil SteriL 2008, 90(1):84-91.
  • 7闫铮,匡延平,薛松果,吕祁峰,李斌.透明带激光削薄法在玻璃化冻融胚胎移植中的作用[J].生殖与避孕,2014,34(9):718-724. 被引量:2
  • 8Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RL, et al. Laser-assisted hatching of cryopreserved-thawed embryos by thinning one quarter of the zona. Reprod Biomed Online, 2006, 13(5): 668-75.
  • 9Frydman N, Madoux S, Hesters L, et al. A randomized double- blind controlled study on the efficacy of laser zona pellucida thinning on live birth rates in cases of advanced female age.Hum Reprod, 2006, 21 (8):2131-5.
  • 10Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, et al. Effect of laser zona thinning on vitrified-warmed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a prospective, randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online, 2010, 20(2):234-42.

二级参考文献40

  • 1田辉,傅永伦,匡延平.无GnRH-a降调激素替代和hMG促排作子宫内膜准备对冻融胚胎移植影响的研究[J].生殖与避孕,2006,26(6):344-347. 被引量:17
  • 2张琪瑶,管群,孔风云,任兰青,孙伟.激光辅助孵化在冻融胚胎移植中的临床研究[J].生殖与避孕,2007,27(9):581-584. 被引量:2
  • 3Rall WF,Fahy GM.Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at-196℃by vitrification.Nature,1985,313(6003):573-5.
  • 4Gordts S,Roziers P,Campo R,et al.Survival and pregnancy outcome after ultrarapid freezing of human embryos.Fertil Steril,1990,53(3):469-72.
  • 5Rama Raju GA,Haranath GB,Krishna KM,et al.Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos,a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates.Reprod Biomed Online,2005,11(4):434-7.
  • 6Manna C,Rienzi L,Greco E,et al.Zona pellucida solubility and cortical granule complements in human oocytes following assisted reproductive techniques.Zygote,2001,9(3):201-10.
  • 7Vanderzwalmen P, Bettin G, Debauche CH, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the hemi-Straw carrier applica- tion of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18(7):1504-11.
  • 8Cohen J,Elsner C,Kort H,et al.Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation.Hum Reprod,1990,5(1):7-13.
  • 9Cieslak J,Ivakhnenko V,Wolf G,et al.Three-dimensiional partial zona dissection for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and assisted hatching.Fertil Steril,1999,71(2):308-13.
  • 10Cohen J,Alikani M,Trowbridge J,et al.Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis.Hum Reprod,1992,7(5):685-91.

共引文献1

同被引文献42

  • 1Butts SF, Owen C, Mainigi M, et al. Assisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analysis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102 (4): 1041-7.
  • 2Martins WP, Rocha IA, Ferriani RA, et al. Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and recta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update, 2011, 17(4):438-53.
  • 3de Moraes LA, de Miranda Cota AM. Assisted hatching improves implantation rates on cryopreserved-thawed embryos: a randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(5): 1429.
  • 4Balaban B, Urman B, Yakin K, et al. Laser-assisted hatching increases pregnancy and implantation in cryopreserved em- bryos that were allowed to cleave in vitro after thawing: aprospective randomized study. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(8): 2136-40.
  • 5Wan CY, Song C, Diao LH, et al. Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed blasto- cysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos: a prospective randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online, 2014, 28(5):582-9.
  • 6Kutlu P, Atvar O, Vanlioglu OF. Laser assisted zona thinning technique has no beneficial effect on the ART outcomes of two different maternal age groups. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2010, 27(8):457-61.
  • 7Ng EH, Naveed F, Lau EY, et al. A randomized double-blind controlled study of the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching on implantation and pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(4):979-85.
  • 8Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproduc- tive Medicine. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(2):348-51.
  • 9Sachin D, Uppangala S, Salian SR, et al. Laser-assistedhatching of cleavage-stage embryos impairs developmental potential and increases DNA damage in blastocysts. La- sers Med Sci, 2015, 30(1):95-101.
  • 10Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Pelerson HB, et al. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in preg- nancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril, 2000, 74(2):288-94.

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部