摘要
目的:比较连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)与血液透析(HD)治疗流行性出血热的疗效。方法:72例流行性出血热患者按照随机数字表法分为治疗组(n=38)和对照组(n=34)。治疗组给予连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT),对照组给予血液透析(HD)治疗,比较两组的疗效。结果:治疗组肌酐、尿素氮、住院天数、并发心力衰竭人数与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:连续性肾脏替代治疗治疗流行性出血热安全,并发症少,缩短了住院时间,值得临床推广应用。
Objective： To investigate the therapeutic efficacies of continuous renal replacement therapy （ CRRT ） and haemodialysis （ HD ） on hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome.Method： Seventy-two hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome were randomly divided into two groups, 38 patients in the treatment group were administrated with CRRT, 34 patients in the control group were treated with HD, the effects of two groups were compared.Rusuit： The creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, average hospital stay and the scram level of heart failure were statistical difference between two groups （ P〈0.05 ） .Conclusion： Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome treated with CRRT is safty, lower scrnm level and shorter hospital stay, it is worthy to be popularized in clinic.
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2016年第12期28-31,共4页
Medical Innovation of China
关键词
流行性出血热
连续性肾脏替代治疗
血液透析
心力衰竭
肌酐
尿素氮
Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome
Continuous renal replacement therapy
Haemodialysis
Heart failure
Creatinine
Blood urea nitrogen
