期刊文献+

认知风格和他人反馈对大学生网络社交满意度的影响 被引量:3

The Effect of Cognitive Styles and Feedback Types on College Students' Online Social Satisfaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用实验法和问卷法,探讨了认知风格和他人反馈对大学生网络社交满意度的影响,结果发现:(1)场依存型被试更愿意在微信朋友圈中发布状态;(2)接受肯定反馈后,被试与反馈者进行后续交往、发布类似消息的意愿最强,收到否定反馈时较弱,未收到反馈时最差;(3)反馈类型和认知风格的交互作用在是否愿意发布类似消息意愿上边缘显著,仅在收到否定反馈后,场依存组更愿意发布类似消息。结果表明:认知风格和他人反馈对网络社交的影响与其对传统社交的影响相似。 The study aims to investigate the effects of cognitive styles and feedback types on college students’ online social satisfaction through the experiment and questionnaire. The results showed that:(1)The dependent subjects were more willing to using friends’ circle;(2) After the given feedback, on the subjects’ attitude toward comments and commentators as well as the willing of making friends with the commentators later on and posting similar information in real life, the main effect of feedback types was significant. The score of reaction to the positive feedback was higher than the negative one, and no-feedback reaction got the lowest score;(3) The interaction between feedback types and cognitive styles had a significant tendency and the dependent group was more likely to post similar information than the independent group after receiving negative feedbacks while there was no significant difference in other conditions.These results lead to a conclusion that the influence of cognitive styles and feedback types on online social is similar to that on traditional social.
出处 《心理研究》 2016年第2期80-85,共6页 Psychological Research
基金 北京林业大学"国家级大学生创新创业训练计划"(201510022048)
关键词 认知风格 反馈类型 社交满意度 微信朋友圈 大学生 cognitive style feedback types social satisfaction wechat friends’ circle college students
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1沃建中,闻莉,周少贤.认知风格理论研究的进展[J].心理与行为研究,2004,2(4):597-602. 被引量:67
  • 2Tinajero C, Castelo A, Guisande A, et al. Adaptive teaching and field dependence-independence: Instruc- tional implications. Revista Latinoamericana De Psi- cologia, 2011, 43(3): 497-510.
  • 3Tinajero C, Lemos S M, Aratijo M, et al. Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect a- cademic achievement of brazilian university students. Psicol. Reflex. Crit, 2012, 25(1): 105-113.
  • 4张鹏.顾昭明.大学生认知风格对人际交往的影响.中外健康文摘,2013,(4):130—131.
  • 5刘聚红.中学生认知风格、人际交往与考试焦虑的相关研究.陕西师范大学硕士学位论文,2010.
  • 6胡芳.论互联网影响下的人际关系[J].社会心理科学,2010(7):3-5. 被引量:6
  • 7Graft M. Cognitive style and attitudes towards using online learning and assessment methods. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 2003, (1): 21-28.
  • 8DeTure M. Cognitive style and seff-eltlcacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 2004, 18(1): 21-38.
  • 9郑晓娜.大学生微信使用现状调查与分析——以全国208所高校为例[J].思想理论教育,2014(2):83-86. 被引量:205
  • 10冬人.2015最具价值APP排行榜TOPl00.互联网经济.2015.

二级参考文献17

  • 1李寿欣,宋广文.西方认知方式研究概观[J].国外社会科学,1999(1):20-25. 被引量:33
  • 2周帆,王登峰.人格特质与外显自尊和内隐自尊的关系[J].心理学报,2005,37(1):100-105. 被引量:56
  • 3贺雯.认知方式研究的进展[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):631-632. 被引量:24
  • 4Andrew Calcutt,WhiteNoise: AnA-Z ofthe Contradiction in Cyberculture, NewYork: ST· MARTIN' SPRESS, INC· 1999,p25.
  • 5马倩 裴旭.《青少年网上交往特点及所存在问题的分析》[J].当代青年研究,2000,(3).
  • 6Patricia Wallace.互联网心理学[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001.
  • 7LifangZhang.Thinkingstyles:Universitystudents’’preferredteachingstylesandtheirconceptionsofeffectiveteachers. TheJournalofPsychology . 2004
  • 8JonesAE.Reflection-impulsivityandwholist-analytic:twofledglings?orisR-Iacuckoo?. EducationalPsychology . 1997
  • 9LifangZhang.Arethinkingstylesandpersonalitytypesrelated?. EducationalPsychology . 2000
  • 10RidingR,CaineT.CognitivestyleandGCSEperformanceinmathematics. EnglishLanguageandFrenchEduational . 1993

共引文献277

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部