期刊文献+

不确定条件下用于多方案比选的变权-SIR方法

Multiple schemes selection based on dynamic weight SIR under uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对评价信息存在模糊性、不确定性及不完备性的多方案比选问题,考虑短板指标对各方案综合评价值的影响,引入置信度的概念和变权原理,提出一种新的不确定条件下的变权-优劣势排序(dynamic-weight superiority and inferiority ranking under uncertainty,DWUSIR)方法。利用带置信度结构的语言评价值表达评价信息的不完备性或专家评价的不确定性和模糊性;基于变权原理,通过状态变权函数构造变权模型,兼顾决策者的主观偏好与目标状态值的影响。最后,通过算例分析验证了新提出的方法的有效性和合理性。 For the multiple schemes selection issue with imprecise, uncertainty and uncompleteness, with a view to the effect of short-board attributes in the decision making, therefore a novel dynamic-weight superiority and inferiority ranking under uncertainty(DWUSIR) approach is developed by using the concept of degrees of belief and the dynamic-weight theory. The linguistics terms with degrees of belief are introduced to present the incompletemess, uncertain data as well as the insufficient expertise. Based on the dynamic weight theory, the dynamic weight model is constrcted by the state variable weight function. The variable weights are determined by preset weights and state values of the attributes. A case study is used to illustrate the validity and the feasi- bility of the novel framework.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期1093-1099,共7页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(3132013320) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金(L14AGL003) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20102125110002)资助课题
关键词 多属性决策 不确定性 母型船优选 动态权重 优劣势排序 multiple attribute decision making uncertainty reference ship selection dynamic weight su-periority and inferiority ranking (SIR)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Xie X L,Xu D L,Yang J B,et al.Ship selection using a multi-ple-criteria synthesis approach[J].Journal of Marine Science and Technology,2008,13(1):50-62.
  • 2Xu X Z.The SIR method:a superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteriadecision making[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,131(3):587-602.
  • 3王坚强.信息不完全的多准则决策的SIR方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9):1205-1208. 被引量:15
  • 4Marzouk M,Shinnawy N E,Moselhi O,et al.Measuring sensitivity of procurement decisions using superiority and inferiority ranking[J].International Journal of Information Technology &Decision Making,2013,12(3):395-423.
  • 5Fan Z P,Zhang X,Chen F D,et al.Extended TODIM method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems [J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,42(4):40-48.
  • 6Chai J Y,Liu N K,Xu Z.A new rule-based SIR approach to supplier selection under intuitionist fuzzy Environment[J].International Journal of Uncertainty,Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems,2012,20(3):451-471.
  • 7Ma Z J,Zhang N,Dai Y.A novle SIR method for multiple attributes group decision making problem under hesitant fuzzy environment [J].Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems,2014,26(5):2119-2130.
  • 8王方,李华,张晓.混合型多属性决策的HB-SIR方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2015,37(5):1099-1105. 被引量:9
  • 9Chai J Y,Liu N K.A novel multicriteria group decision making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy SIR method[C]// Proc.of the World Automation Congress,2010:1-6.
  • 10Yang Z L,Mastralis L,Bonsall S,et al.Incorporating uncertainty and multiple criteria in vessel selection[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part M:Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment,2009,223(2):177-188.

二级参考文献34

  • 1王坚强.信息不完全的多准则决策的SIR方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9):1205-1208. 被引量:15
  • 2夏勇其,吴祈宗.一种混合型多属性决策问题的TOPSIS方法[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(6):630-634. 被引量:169
  • 3Roy B, Present M, Silhol D. A Programming Method for Determining with Pries Metro Stations Should Renovated[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1986,24(2) :318 - 334.
  • 4Dias L C, Joaon C. ELECTRE TRI for Groups with Imprecise Information on Parameter Values[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2000,9:355 - 377.
  • 5Juan C, Edurdo F. A New Method for Group Decision Support Based on ELECTRE Ⅲ Methodology[J]. European Journal of Operation Research,2003,148:14-27.
  • 6Dias L C, Mousseau V, Figueira J. An Aggregation/Disaggregation Approach to Obtain Robust Conclusions with ELECTRE TRI[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2002,138:332- 348.
  • 7Mousseau V, Slowinski R. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Mdels from Assignment Examples[J]. J. Global Optimization, 1998,12:157- 174.
  • 8Mousseau V, Figueira J, Naux J. Using Assignment Examples to Infer Weights for ELECTRE TRI Method: Some Experiments Results[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2001,130:263 -275.
  • 9Takeda E. A Method for Multiple Pseudo-Criteria Decision Problem[J].Computers & Operations Research, 2001,28:1427- 1439.
  • 10Goumas M, Lygerou V. An Extension of the PROMETHEE Method for Decision Making in Fuzzy Environment: Ranking of Alternative Energy Exploitation[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2000, 123:606-613.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部