专利密集型产业权利体合作关系的差异研究被引量：4

Study on Differences of Cooperation Relationship of Right-subjects in Patent-intensive Industries between China and U. S.

下载PDF

导出

摘要 [目的/意义]专利密集型产业作为较为依赖专利制度的产业,在不同的国家虽大致相同但又有所差异,因此有必要通过实证研究增加理论依据。[方法/过程]选取电气工程产业和化学产业为研究对象,采用德温特数据库选取国际专利分类号(IPC)进行对应的产业检索,探讨了中美典型专利密集型产业权利体合作关系的差异。[结果/结论]中美两国电气工程产业的权利体相互合作申请专利的关系较之化学产业的要紧密,而国别差异主要体现在中国产业的权利体合作关系中,企业与高校及科研机构的合作都比较密切,而美国的权利体合作关系中则主要是企业之间相互进行合作。 [Purpose / Significance] As the industries highly dependent on patent system,the patent- intensive industries in different countries are similar,but still there are some differences,and it is important to carry out an empirical analysis to help build a sound theory basis. [Method / Process] It analyzes electrical engineering industry and chemical industry and discusses the differences of cooperation relationship of right- subjects in China and U. S by using DWPI database and IPC（ International Patent Classification）. [Result / Conclusion] It shows that the cooperation relationship of right- subjects in electrical engineering industry is closer than that in chemical industry in both countries. Cross- country differences suggest that the industry- university cooperation is more frequently witnessed in China than in U. S.

作者姜南

机构地区同济大学法学院/知识产权学院

出处《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期87-91,86,共6页 Journal of Intelligence

基金国家自然科学基金青年项目"专利密度视角下专利制度影响我国产业经济发展的传导机制研究"(编号:71403188) 上海市软科学研究计划项目"上海市专利密集型产业创新效应演化及对策研究"(编号:14692104100)的研究成果之一

关键词专利密集型产业权利体合作关系中美对比 patent-intensive subjects of right cooperation relationship comparison between China and U.S

分类号 F203 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Levin R C, Klevorick A K, Nelson R R, et al. Appropriating the Returns From Industrial Research and Development [ J ]. Brook- ings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987,1987 (3) :783-831.
2Mansfield E. R&D and Innovation:Some Empirical Findings. In: Gfiliches, Z. ( Ed. ), R&D, Patents and Productivity [ J ]. NBER Conference Report, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1984 ( 1 ) :127-148.
3Mansfield E. Patents and Innovation: an Empirical Study [ J ]. Management Science, 1986, ( 32 ) : 173-181.
4Cohen W M, Nelson R R, Walsh J P. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets:Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Finns Patent ( or not ) [J ]- National Bureau of Economic Re- search Working Paper Series No. 7552,2000, (01) : 1-54.
5Robson M, Townsend J, Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of production and use of innovations in the UK: 1945 - 1983 [ J]. Research Policy, 1988,17( 1 ) :1-14.
6Qian Y. Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Domestic Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? a Cross Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 1978- 2002 [ J ]. Review of E- conomics and Statistics,2007,89 (3) :436 -453.
7Lerner J. The Intellectual Property Rights System and its role in Innovation and Economic Performance [ C ]. The Economic Value of Intellectual Property: An Agenda for Policy- Relevant Re- search ,2009:01-67.
8朱雪忠,罗敏.以专利政策为核心的低碳政策互动机制研究——从促进低碳技术创新的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2013(4):109-115. 被引量：8
9张平.论知识产权制度的“产业政策原则”[J].北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2012,49(3):121-132. 被引量：37
10USPTO. Intellectual property and the U. S. Economy:Industries in Focus [ EB/OL ]. [ 2012 - 5 - 04 ]. http ://www. uspto, gov/ news/publication s/IP_Report_March_2012, pdf.