期刊文献+

WHO指南评审原则与方法 被引量:8

Review Principles and Methods of WHO Guidelines
原文传递
导出
摘要 为进一步让中国的指南制定者、临床医生、卫生政策制定者以及相关研究人员深入了解和恰当使用世界卫生组织(World Health Organization,WHO)指南,GRADE中国中心联合WHO指南评审委员会(Guidelines Review Committee,GRC)围绕WHO指南的制定方法、评审原则和结构内容撰写了三篇系列文章。本文是本系列第二篇文章,主要介绍了WHO-GRC的组成、工作和职能。 In order to help Chinese guideline developers, clinicians, health policy makers and other relevant researchers fully understand and make appropriate use of World Health Organization(WHO) guidelines, Chinese GRADE Center and Guidelines Review Committee of World Health Organization(WHO-GRC) have written a series of papers about development methods, review principles and the structure and content of WHO guidelines. This is the second paper of this series introducing the composition, main work and functions of WHO-GRC.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2016年第4期478-481,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(编号:81503459)
关键词 WHO指南 指南评审委员会 评审原则 评审方法 WHO Guidelines Guidelines Review Committee Review principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1丁泓帆,杨楠,邓围,李乐,吴琼芳,王小琴,王琪,韦当,姚亮,陈耀龙,杨克虎.WHO指南制定的基本原则和方法[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(4):471-477. 被引量:62
  • 2丁泓帆,肖淑君,杨楠,邓围,李乐,王琪,王小琴,吴琼芳,韦当,姚亮,陈耀龙,杨克虎.WHO指南实例解读[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(4):482-487. 被引量:3
  • 3Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Fretheim A, et i-l. Use of evidence in WHO recommendations. Lancet, 2007, 370(9576): 824.
  • 4World Health Organization. WHO handbook for guideline development. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012.
  • 5World Health Organization. WHO Handbook of Guideline Development 2rid edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014.
  • 6Available at: http://www.who.int/kms/handbook_2nd ed.pdf.
  • 7World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for guideline development. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.
  • 8刘红,胡新和.学术期刊同行评审的发展、方式及挑战[J].中国科技期刊研究,2005,16(5):605-608. 被引量:27
  • 9David S, Rachel I, Tamara K, et al. World Health Organization guideline development: an evaluation. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): 59.

二级参考文献38

  • 1江星.论非理性因素对科技期刊专家审稿的影响[J].编辑学报,2004,16(4):245-246. 被引量:24
  • 2.[EB/OL].http :∥prep. nstl. gov. cn/eprint/help. jsp,.
  • 3.[EB/OL].http :∥xxx. lanl. gov,.
  • 4.[EB/OL].http:∥www. lib. tsinghua. edu. cn/NEW/e-print. htm,.
  • 5.[EB/OL].http :∥fr. arxiv. org/new/,.
  • 6Trisha Gura. Peer review unmasked. Nature, 2002, 416:258 ~260.
  • 7[美]RK默顿著 鲁旭东 林聚任 译.科学社会学(下册)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..
  • 8Drummond Rennie. Editorial peer review: its development and rationale. http:∥bmj. bmjjournals. com/advice/peer-review/rennie.pdf.
  • 9Smith R. Open up BMJ peer review: A beginning that should lead to complete transparency. Editorial, British Medical Journal, 1999,318:4 ~5.
  • 10.[EB/OL].http:∥www. copernicus. org/EGU/acp/ACPStats2. html,.

共引文献88

同被引文献109

  • 1Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks ElM, Custers JWH, et al. Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy. BMC Health Serv Res, 2007, 7(1): 191.
  • 2Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. Guidelines for WHO Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003 (EIP/ GPE/EQC/2003.1 ).
  • 3World Health Organization. WHO Handbook of Guideline Development. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/75146/1/978924154844 l_eng.pdf.
  • 4World Health Organization. WHO Handbook of Guideline Development 2nd edition. Available at: http://www.who.int/kms/ handbook_2nd_ed.pdf.
  • 5GRADE Working Group. Available at: http://www. gradeworkinggroup.org.
  • 6World Health Organization. Twelfth General Programme of Work: not merely the absence of disease. Available at: http://www.who.int/ about/resources_planning/twelfth-gpw/en/.
  • 7Higgins JPT. Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 8Guyatt GH, Oxman A D, Schfinemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 380-382.
  • 9Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926.
  • 10Schfinemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et aL Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336(7653): 1106-1110.

引证文献8

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部