“并合主义”刑罚观对我国刑法立法的推动——以《刑法修正案(九)》为视角

The Penalty Concept of “Combination Theory of Punishment ”to Promote Chinese Criminal Legislation——An analysis of the Criminal Law Amendment( Ⅸ)

与西方先"报应"后"防卫"的刑罚观进程不同,我国从1979年刑法(以"防卫"为主)到1997年刑法走过的是在"罪刑法定原则"规制下,循序渐进地走上刑罚"并合主义"之路。可以说,《刑法修正案(一至八)》,尤其《刑法修正案(九)》的大量条文都体现的是"并合主义"刑罚观,这在我国的刑法立法史上当然是一个不小的进步。然而,"并合主义"也并非十全十美,包括《刑法修正案(九)》中对其的运用也非全部到位,尤其在把握"报应"与"防卫"的融合机制上尚未达到精准的地步或完全符合我国的实际国情。甚至没能从社会发展阶段的实际需要上来有效把握"并合主义"理念在我国立法与司法实践中的灵活运用,从而实现在"并合主义"刑罚观的指引下使得罪刑均衡和刑罚个别化的高度统一。

Different from the west penalty concept of first＂Retribution＂after＂Prevention＂,in our country from the 1979 Criminal Law（ with＂Prevention＂） to the Criminal Law of 1997 is under the regulation of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime,step by step to go on the road of＂Combination Theory of Punishment＂. It can be said that the Criminal Law Amendment（ Ⅰ - Ⅷ）,especially a large number of articles in Criminal Law Amendment（ Ⅸ） is the embodiment of the penalty concept of ＂Combination Theory of Punishment ＂,this is certainly a big progress in the history of the criminal legislation of our country. However,the＂Combination Theory of Punishment ＂is not perfect in every respect,including the use of Criminal Law Amendment（ Ⅸ） is not all in place,especially in the fusion mechanism to grasp the＂Retribution＂and＂Prevention＂have not yet reached the precise point or completely accord with the actual condition of our country,even could not to effectively grasp the flexible use of＂Combination Theory of Punishment ＂in legislation and judicial practice of our country based on the actual needs of the social development,in order to achieve the highly unity of principle of individualization of punishment and the principle of balance between crime and punishment under the guidance of ＂Combination Theory of Punishment ＂.