摘要
"逻辑型"专利的侵权裁定权、赔偿额裁定权、专利性裁定权、"专利权利要求解释"的裁定权都配置给法官,这种制度是否会激化社会矛盾,从美国的"动脉支架案"中可以引发一些思考。
Infringement adjudication,compensation adjudication and patent of adjudication of "Logical" patent as well as adjudication of "Interpretation of patent claims." are configured to judge. Whether this system would intensify social contradictions. We can throw some thoughts from the United States "stent" Case.
出处
《科技促进发展》
2016年第1期84-86,共3页
Science & Technology for Development
关键词
逻辑型专利
知识产权战略
"Logical" patent
intellectual property strategy