期刊文献+

论美国宪法中的行政组织法定原则 被引量:9

On the American Constitutional Principle that Administrative Office Should be Established by Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国独立革命超越了普通法传统,提出了行政组织法定原则,但并非基于依法行政的需要,而是防止政治腐败。立法对于行政组织的设置享有细密的规范权力,排除了组织法事项的"行政保留",但是宪法确立的总统领导责任构成了对国会宽泛的组织设置权限的制约。法院在裁判中不只维护了宪法的分权原则,案例法也成为美国行政组织法的重要渊源。我国行政组织法学研究同样需要某种宪政视野和思路。 The American Revolution transcends the legal tradition of common law and generates the doctrine of statutory administrative bureaucracy, which is not aiming at rule of law, but to prevent from the political corruption. The Congress alone has a broad and exclusive power to create and specify the de- tails of the administrative bureaucracy. However, the presidential leadership which is set up by constitu- tion makes up a check on that broad power. By giving judgement, the judicial branch also plays a positive role in maintaining the check and balance. Therefore the case law becomes an important legal resource of the organic law of administrative bureaucracy. Likewise, our research on organic law of administrative bureaucracy should also be conducted under some constitutional perspective.
作者 步超
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期332-354,共23页 Peking University Law Journal
基金 国家留学基金委“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”的资助
关键词 行政组织法 组织法定 分权制衡 责任性 官僚制 Organic Act Legalization of Administrative Body Check and Balance Accountability Bureaucracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献79

  • 1[日]大桥洋一:《行政法的结构变革》,吕艳滨译,中国人民大学出版社2008年版,页269-270页.
  • 2[日]室井力 吴微译.《日本现代行政法》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1995年版.第51、34页.
  • 3台湾行政法学会:《行政法争议问题研究(上)》,五南图书出版公司2001年版,页279-280.
  • 4沈岿.公共行政组织建构的合法化进路[J].法学研究,2005,27(4):88-99. 被引量:33
  • 5Saikrishna B. Prakash, "Fragmented Features of the Constitution's Unitary Executive", 45 Willarnette Law Review, 701(2009).
  • 6See O.F. Robinson, T.D. Fergus, W.M. Gordon,European legal history : sources and institutions, But- terworths legal Publisher, 1994, p.32.
  • 7honouro See J. E. A.Jolliffe, Angevin Kingship, A. ~ C. Black Ltd., 1963, pp.29-30.
  • 8See Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, vol. 1, J.B. Lippincott Co., 1893, pp.180-181.
  • 9See John M. Owen IV, The Clash of Ideas in World Politics ~ Transnational Networks, States, and Regime Change, 1510-2010, Princeton University Press, 2010, p.129.
  • 10See Constantin Fasolt, Past Sense- Studies in Medieval and Early Modern European History, Andrew Colin Gow. Leiden, 2014, p.226.

二级参考文献116

共引文献293

同被引文献123

引证文献9

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部