期刊文献+

风景画与“图像的转向”:以安克斯密特为基点的考察 被引量:1

Landscape Painting and “Pictorial Turn”:An Analysis from Perspective of Ankersmit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在安克斯密特关于"图像的转向"的历史表现理论中,有关风景画的论述有着可以深入展开的意义。关于风景画起源的论述是和他对绘画作品画框的关注相联系的,风景画作为扩大了的画框之新的中心与历史写作的进展联系起来。但安克斯密特并未因此赋予风景画对历史表现的特殊性。本文关注的转向之风景画,侧重风景画对历史表现的诗性隐喻,它作为一种内在的形式要素,凸显了历史性理解的生成和在场。由此,可以尝试从动词性风景画表现来考察一种可能的历史表现的表达性理解。 In his the relatedness of is analyzed hing to be "pictorial turn" paradigm of historical representation, Frank Ankersmit discusses landscape painting and historical representation. The origin of landscape painting in relationship to his analysis of frame, and particularly, landscape painting's approac- a new center of the enlarged frame is taken as a metaphor for the development of historical writing. However, Ankersmit does not pay enough attention to the import of landscape painting in its specific reference to historical representation. In this article, "turn to landscape painting" will be explored in more details, and emphasis will be on the landscape painting as a poetic metaphor for historical representation. As a formal element inherent, landscape painting helps to present the individuality of historical understanding, which is, theory of historical representation may be well painting as a verb, "to paint", instead of as a coming to be at present. Therefore, an expressive understood through the representation of landscape noun, "painting"
作者 陈书焕
出处 《文化艺术研究》 2016年第1期137-143,共7页 Studies in Culture and Art
关键词 安克斯密特 风景画 诗性隐喻 表达性表现 Frank Ankersmit landscape painting poetic metaphor expressive representation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1W. J. T. Mitchell. Landscape and Power [ M ]. 2nd edition.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2002: 1.
  • 2F. R. Ankersmit. History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall ofMetaphor [ M]. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1994.
  • 3贡布里希.文艺复兴时期的艺术理论和风景画的兴起[M]//范景中.艺术与人文科学·贡布里希文选.杭州:浙江摄影出版社,1989.
  • 4F. R. Ankersmit. “Presence” and Myth [ J] . History and The-.
  • 5John Zammito. Ankersmit and Historical Representation [ J ].History and Theory, 2005 ( 44) : 172.
  • 6普特南.理性、真理与历史[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1997..
  • 7F. R. Ankersmit. History and Tropology : The Rise and Fall ofMetaphor [ M]. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1994 :160.
  • 8弗兰克.安克斯密特,张骏.在场与表现——当代美学理论对于历史表现的启示[J].江西社会科学,2011,31(2):251-256. 被引量:4
  • 9Frank Ankersmit. Historiography and Postmodernism: Reconsid-erations :Reply to Zagorin [ J] . History and Theory, 1990, 29(3): 292-294.
  • 10Hans Kellner. Ankersmit * s proposal : let * s keep in touch[J]. Clio, 2006 , 36 : 95.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Hans - Ulrich Gumbrecht, Pro-duction of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey, Stanford, 2004, p. 31.
  • 2F.R. Ankersmit, SublimeHistorical Experience, Stanford 2005, pp. 270 - 2720.
  • 3Mayer Schapiro, On SomeProblems in the Semiotics of Visual Art. Field and Vehicle in Image-Signs, in Semiotica I (1969), pp. 224-225.
  • 4Jacques Den'ida, Laverite en peinture, Paris, 1986o.
  • 5Friedrich Holderlin, Hyperion. Die metrischeFassung, in id., Somtliche Werke, Hrsg. Friedrich Beissher, Frankfurt am Main, 1961, S. 673.
  • 6尼采.《悲剧的诞生》,周国平译,北京:华龄出版社,1997年,第3页.

共引文献35

同被引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部