期刊文献+

科斯定理、策略行为与夜市烧烤扰民问题研究——基于驻马店市团结路“喇叭大战”案例的思考

Coase Theorem,Strategic Behavior and Problem of Disturbance Imposed by Night Market Barbecue Shops upon the Residents——A Case Study on the Trumpet Warfare Happening on Tuanjie Road,Zhumadian City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 夜市烧烤扰民问题是当下城市管理中的一个棘手问题,这是一个与负外部性相关的问题,科斯定理是分析这一问题的常用视角。对驻马店市团结路上的"喇叭大战"的个案研究表明,在夜市烧烤扰民的问题上,科斯定理过于乐观,问题双方之间的行为更符合霍布斯定理的观点,策略行为的存在阻止了科斯式讨价还价,使得双方陷入囚徒困境。霍布斯定理主张政府或法律干预解决这一问题,但案例中驻马店当局的干预却不算成功。基于博弈论提出的质押金方案,融合了科斯定理和霍布斯定理,既强调政府干预的重要性,又强调科斯式讨价还价的作用,可以使烧烤商户不扰民的承诺可置信。在夜市场所规划不合理、夜市搬迁难以短期内实施的情况下,这一方案为解决夜市烧烤扰民问题提供了选择。 The problem of disturbance imposed by night market barbecue shops upon the residents is a thorny one puzzling the current city management authorities,which is negative externality related and Coase Theorem is often employed to analyzeit The case study on the trumpet warfare happening on Tuanjie Road,Zhumadian city shows that Coase Theorem is overly optimistic when dealing with the trumpet warfare and the concerned two sides' behavior conformed more to the Hobbes Theorem,manifesting itself into the fact that the strategic behavior impeded Coasean bargaining and the two sides were trapped in prisoners' dilemma.Hobbes Theorem proposes that the regulation of government or law is necessary,while the regulation of the authorities in Zhumadian city failed.A hostage solution based on game theory and blending Coase Theorem with Hobbes Theorem,both emphasizing government' s regulation and Coasean bargaining,makes the barbecue merchants' commitment credible.Given that the planning of the night market place is irrational and the movement of night market is implausible in the short term,this solution will provide an option.
作者 李谭君
出处 《湖南财政经济学院学报》 2016年第2期81-91,共11页 Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社科规划青年项目"地方政府财政供给中的准市场机制研究"(项目编号:13YJC630079)
关键词 科斯定理 策略行为 夜市烧烤扰民 霍布斯定理 质押金方案 Coase Theorem strategic behavior problem of disturbance imposed by night market barbecue shops upon the residents Hobbes Theorem hostage solution
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1李斌.烧烤摊也是治理的考场[N].人民日报,2014-05-6(05).
  • 2YinR,.K.Case Study Research Methods[M].Third Edition.Thousand Oaks,London and New Delhi:Sage Publications,2003.39-42.
  • 3Coase R.K The Problem of Social Cost[J].The Journal of Law and Economics,1960,(3):1-44.
  • 4袁庆明,熊衍飞.科斯三定理的新表述与新证明[J].当代财经,2010(7):11-18. 被引量:7
  • 5Medema S.G.&Zerbe,Jr R,0.The Coase Theorem[A].In Bouckaert B.&De Ceest,G(Eds),The Encyclopedia of Law and Economics[C].VoL 1.Cheltenham:Edvard Elgar,1999.836-892.
  • 6Cooter,R.D.The Cost of Coase[J].The Journal of Legal Studies,1982,(1):1-33.
  • 7Daly G.&Giertz J,F.Externalities,Extortion,and Efficiency[J].The American Economic Review,1975,(5):997-1001.
  • 8Mumey G.A.The Coase Theorem:A Reexamination[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1971(4):718-723.
  • 9Medema S.G.'A Magnificent Business Prospect…'The Coase Theorem,the Extortion Problem,and the Creation of Coase Theorem Worlds[J].Journal of Institutional Economics,2015,(2):353-378.
  • 10Canterbery E.R.&Marvasti A.The Coase Theorem as a Negative Externality[J].Journal of Economic Issues,1992(4):1179-1189.

二级参考文献20

  • 1科斯.生产的制度结构[A].企业的性质[C].北京:商务印书馆,2007.
  • 2科斯.《企业的性质》的影响[A].企业、市场与法律[C].上海:上海三联书店,1990.
  • 3科斯.社会成本问题[A]..财产权利与制度变迁[C].上海:上海三联出版社,1994.3-52.
  • 4吴宣恭.产权理论比较[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2000..
  • 5张五常.社会成本的神话[A].张五常.经济解释[C].北京:商务印书馆,2000.
  • 6科斯.“社会成本问题“的注释[A].论生产的制度结构[C].上海:上海三联书店,1994
  • 7新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典[Z].北京:经济科学出版社.1992.273.
  • 8张五常.论新制度经济学[A].经济解释[C].北京:商务印书馆.2000
  • 9科斯.新制度经济学[A].论生产的制度结构[C].上海:上海三联书店.1994.347—349
  • 10波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部