期刊文献+

Ⅲ型标准伽玛(γ)型髓内钉与股骨近端锁定板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较研究 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比Ⅲ型标准伽玛(γ)型髓内钉与股骨近端锁定板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院自2012-01—2013-04分别采用Ⅲ型标准伽玛(γ)型髓内钉和股骨近端锁定板内固定治疗的65例股骨粗隆间骨折。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间和髋关节Harris评分。结果所有患者随访8-24个月,平均13.5个月。Ⅲ型标准伽玛(γ)型髓内钉组手术时间、术中出血量均少于股骨近端锁定板组,经统计学分析差异有意义(P〈0.05);两组之间Harris评分和骨折愈合时间比较,经统计学分析差异无意义(P〉0.05)。结论Ⅲ型标准伽玛(γ)型髓内钉内固定术具有适应症广,手术时间短,创伤小,术中出血少,固定牢靠,患者恢复快等优点。
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2016年第4期401-402,共2页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Kesmezacar H,Ayhan E,Unlu MC,et a/. Predictors of mortality in elderly patients with an intertrochanteric or a femoral neck fracture [J]. J Trauma,2010,68( 1 ) : 153-158.
  • 2Moran CG,Wenn RT,Sikand M ,et 8.1. Early mortality after hip frac- ture:is delay before surgery important?[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am). 2005,87 (3) : 483-489.
  • 3创伤骨科患者深静脉血栓形成筛查与治疗的专家共识[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2013,15(12):1013-1017. 被引量:166
  • 4叶秀章,顾龙殿,周成欢,马立良.DHS与PFNA内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(4):346-347. 被引量:32
  • 5Song W,Chen Y ,Shen H,et al. Biochemical markers comparison of dynamic hip screw and Gamma nail implants in the treatment of sta- ble intertrochanteric fracture:a prospective study of 60 patients[J]. J lnt Med Res, 2011,39 (3) : 822-829.

二级参考文献51

  • 1朱炯,梁承伟.股骨近端髓内钉治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(8):608-610. 被引量:28
  • 2Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and ac-etabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end resultstudy using a new method of result evaluation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1969,51:737-755.
  • 3Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, et al. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med, 1994, 331: 1601-1606.
  • 4Kanchanabat B, Stapanavatr W, Meknavin S, et al. Systenmtic review and meta-analysis on the rate of postoperative venous thromboem- bolism in orthopaedic surgery in Asian patients without thrombopro- phylaxis. Br J Surg, 2011, 98: 1356-1364.
  • 5Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evi- dence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest, 2012, 141: e278S-325S.
  • 6Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evi- dence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (Sth Edition) . Chest, 2008, 133: 381S-453S.
  • 7Piovella F, Wang CJ, Lu H, et al. Deep-vein thrombosis rates after major orthopedic surgery in Asia. An epidemiological study based on postoperative screening with centrally adjudicated bilateral venogra- phy. J Thromb Haemost, 2005, 3: 2664-2670.
  • 8Goel DP, Buckley R, deVries G, et al. Prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis in fractures below the knee: a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009, 91: 388-394.
  • 9Knudson MM, Collins JA, Goodman SB, et al. Thromboembolism followinz multiole trauma. J Trauma, 1992. 32: 2-11.
  • 10Swann KW, Black PM. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli in neurosurgical patients: a review. J Neurosurg, 1984, 6l: 1055-1062.

共引文献196

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部