摘要
标准必要专利权人有权申请禁令救济,但这项权利的行使应当受到适度规制。具体规制路径的选择中具有代表性的主要有三种:美国模式、德国模式和欧盟模式。我国在积极学习域外代表模式的基础上形成了以反垄断法为框架结合FRAND原则考量的禁令救济规制模式,并在立法、执法、司法方面进行了诸多探索且取得了一定的成果,但仍存在对于"反向专利劫持"认识不够、缺乏认定被许可人"善意"的标准和相关法条完善的局限性。
SEP( standard essential patent) holders has the right to apply for injunctive relief,but the exercise of this right should be regulated moderately. There are three main paths could be chosen to regulate this problem: the United States mode,Germany and the European Union modes. Our country,on the base of learning foreign advanced mode,has formed a law regulation system based on the anti- monopoly law. Our country also makes many explorations in legislation,enforcement,judicial and achieves great achievement. But there are still some problems,such as understanding of patent hijacked"reverse"is not enough,lack of the licensee " goodwill" standard and related law need to be perfected.
出处
《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》
2016年第4期65-68,共4页
JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
关键词
标准必要专利
禁令救济
反垄断
standard essential patent
injunctive relief
anti-monopoly law