期刊文献+

基于人格和人口统计学变量的驾驶风险差异分析研究 被引量:2

Research on Driving Risk Awareness Difference Based on Personality and Demographic Variables
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采取匿名形式的问卷调查,调查了236名昆明市驾驶人的人格和驾驶风险意识状况,获得有效问卷188份。结果表明,不同人格下的驾驶行为,风险感知,风险容忍,风险意识通过Kruskal-Wallis检验的渐进显著性分别为0.022,0.019,0.002,0.042,均小于0.05,具有显著性差异;外向稳定型和外向不稳定型驾驶人的驾驶风险明显低于内向稳定型驾驶人;男性的驾驶风险意识明显低于女性;驾驶风险意识随着驾驶人年龄的增长呈先升后降的趋势;随着驾驶人驾龄的增加,其驾驶风险意识越来越高;学历越高驾驶人的驾驶风险意识水平越高。 This study conducted a survey of 236 drivers concerning their personality types and driving risk awareness by way of anonymous questionnaire in Kunming and obtained 188 valid questionnaires. Results show that the driving risk of extroversive stable personality and extroversive unstable personality was significantly low-er than that of the introverted stable personality; driving risk awareness of men was significantly lower than those in women; with the growth of drivers’ age , the driving risk awareness first increased and then decreased; with the increase of the drivers’ driving years, driving risk awareness was getting better and better; the higher the drivers’ education was, the better their driving risk awareness became.
出处 《华东交通大学学报》 2016年第2期86-92,共7页 Journal of East China Jiaotong University
基金 中国家自然科学基金项目(71361016) 昆明理工大学人培项目(KKZ3201402020) 汽车测控与安全重点实验室开放课题(SZJJ2014-066)
关键词 人格 风险意识 人口统计学 personality risk awareness demographics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1LAJUNEN T D, PARKER D, STRADLING S G .Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers[J]. Transportation Rezearch Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 1998, 1(2): 107-121.
  • 2ELANDER J, WEST R, FRENCH D. Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road traffic rash risk: an examination of methods and findings [J]. Psychology Bull, 1993, 113:279-294.
  • 3BEIRNESS D J. Do we really drive as we live? The role of Personality factors in road crashes[J].Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 1993,9:129-143.
  • 4BROWN I D,GROEER J A. Risk perception and decision taking during the transition between novice and experienced driver status[J]. Ergono mics, 1988,31 : 585-597.
  • 5REASON J,MANSTEAD A,STRADLING S,et al. Errors and violations on the roads:a real distinction? [J].Ergonomics, 1990,33: 1315-1332.
  • 6HUNTER D R. Risk perception and risk tolerance in aircraft pilots[R]. Federal Aviation Administration Washington DC Office of Aviation Medicine, 2002.
  • 7姬鸣,杨仕云,赵小军,鲍旭辉,游旭群.风险容忍对飞行员驾驶安全行为的影响:风险知觉和危险态度的作用[J].心理学报,2011,43(11):1308-1319. 被引量:22
  • 8YILMAZ V, CELIK H E. A model for risky driving attitudes in Turkey [J]. Social Behavior and Personality:an International Jour- nal, 2004,32 (8) : 791-796.
  • 9ROSENBLOOM T,SHAHAR A,ELHARAR A,et al. Risk perception of driving as a function of advanced training aimed at rec- ognizing and handling risks in demanding driving situations[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2008,40(2):697-703.
  • 10HUNTER D R. Risk perception among general aviation pilots[J]. The international journal of aviation psychology,2006,16(2) : 135-144.

二级参考文献1

共引文献21

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部