期刊文献+

潜在可选理论问题探析

原文传递
导出
摘要 库克拉和范·弗拉森分别提出构造经验等价理论的整体和局部算法以表明对比不充分决定论的普遍性。但凯尔·斯坦福认为对比不充分决定论的算法并不能够产生出令科学家信服的、得到科学史支持的科学理论。科学家真正面临的是潜在可选理论问题,即证据无法充分决定我们对现有理论的选择是因为想象力的局限使得科学家没有构想出潜在的与现有理论同等得到观察证据确证的、在未来被科学共同体接受的理论,这样的理论其实同样可供科学家选择。斯坦福通过对科学史的新归纳论证了该问题的普遍性。本文认为,尽管他们没有想象到完整的后继理论,但科学家能够构想到存在于前后相继理论中的贯通解子。
作者 顾益
出处 《哲学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期93-98,共6页 Philosophical Trends
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kyle Stanford, " Underdetermination of Scientific Theory", Edward N. Zalta, ed. Philosophy, 2013, http: //plato. stanford, edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/.
  • 2A. Kukla, "Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals?", Erkenntnis, 44, , The Stanford Encyclopedia of 1996, p. 137.
  • 3范‘弗拉森:《科学的形象》,郑祥福译,上海译文出版社,2005,第59页.
  • 4Laudan, Leplin, "Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination", The Journal of Philosophy, 9, 1991, p. 475.
  • 5Kyle Stanford, "Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously.'?", Philosophy of Science, 9, 2001, p. 5.
  • 6Kyle Stanford, Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 14.
  • 7Chakravartty, "What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You : Realism and the Unconceived", Philosophical Studies, 137, 2008, p. 149.
  • 8迪昂.《物理理论的目的和结构》,孙小礼等译,商务印书馆.2005年版,第89页.
  • 9Lawrence Sklar, "Do Unborn Hypotheses Have Rights?", Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 1981, p. 18.
  • 10Lawrence Sklar, "Methodological Conservatism", Philosophical Review, 84, 1975, p. 390.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Paul Teller,An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press, 1995.
  • 2Sunny Y. Auyang ,How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 3Richard Healey, Gauging What' s Real, Oxford University Press ,2007.
  • 4Tian Yu Cao,"Structural Realism and Quantum Gravity", In Dean Rickles,Steven French,Juha Saatsi (eds), The Structural Foundatios of Quantum Gravity, p. 46.
  • 5Exceeding Our Grasp : Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternative, Oxford University Press,2006.
  • 6康德 邓晓芒译.纯粹理性批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.170-171.
  • 7P. Kyle Stanford. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconeeived Ahematives [M]. New York: Ox-ford University Press, 2006.
  • 8J. J. C. Smart. Philosophy and Scientific Realism[M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1963.
  • 9Hilary Putnam. Mathematics, Matter and Method (Philosophical Papers, vol. I) [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
  • 10Richard N. Boyd.On the current status of the issue of scientific realism[J]. Erkenntnis, 1983, 19, ( 1-3): 45-90.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部