摘要
目的对不同方法检验尿液红细胞的结果进行对比研究。方法选取于2013年5月-2015年12月在本院接受尿液检查的患者350例,将每1位患者的尿液标本均采用尿液流式细胞分析法、尿液干化学分析法、胶体金隐血检测法3种不同的方法进行检验,并对红细胞的检验结果进行分析对比。结果尿液干化学分析法、尿液流式细胞分析法、胶体金隐血检测法的阳性率分别为25.71%、18.57%以及29.71%;任何两种不同检验方法的检验结果比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论不同方法检验尿液红细胞的结果均存在差异,在临床尿液检验中应该联合使用,真正提高检验正确率。
Objective Different methods for test urinary red-blood cell are to be comparatively studied. Methods Chose samples selected from 350 patients who were treated in hospital from May 2013 to December 2015 and three test methods were taken to examine every sample,they were urine flowing cytometry test,urine chemical test and colloidal gold occult blood test respectively,then made a comparative study on test results. Results The positive-identification rates of these three test methods were 25.71%,18.57% and 29.71%,and there was a big differential between each two test methods and such a differential had statistic value(P〈0.05). Conclusion Different methods for test urinary red-blood cell differ from each other,thus,it is suggested to combine these three examination methods in order to make the test much more accurate.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2016年第5期163-164,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
不同方法
尿液检验
红细胞
Different methods
Urine test
Red-blood cell