摘要
目的:探讨剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的有效治疗方法。方法:回顾分析2013年1月至2015年3月复旦大学附属妇产科医院收治的127例CSP患者的临床资料,按治疗方法分组:单纯超声引导下清宫术组(A组)38例,行双侧子宫动脉化疗栓塞后超声引导下清宫术组(B组)72例,宫腹腔镜联合治疗组(C组)17例。比较3组的临床资料和社会经济学指标;分析CSP预后的相关因素。结果:A组患者的病灶体积为(9.76±2.30)cm3,治疗前血β-HCG为(40983±11132.40)m IU/ml,术中出血(48.55±16.07)ml,住院天数(4.63±0.29)天,住院费用(5171.57±730.41)元。B组患者的病灶体积为(27.33±6.47)cm3,治疗前血β-HCG为(76771.23±7582.95)m IU/m L,术中出血(42.32±15.15)ml,住院天数(6.42±0.28)天,住院费用(11113.41±405.94)元。C组患者的病灶体积为(65.82±29.61)cm3,治疗前血β-HCG为(47010.10±112106.42)m IU/m L,术中出血(267.65±113.41)ml,住院天数(6.82±0.52)天,住院费用为(18018.40±1209.61)元。3组的病灶体积比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。C组的术中出血量高于A、B组,差异有统计学意义(P均=0.003);A、B组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组的治疗成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而住院费用比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的住院时间与B、C组比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0001、0.0009);B、C组比较差异则无统计学意义(P=0.4936)。多因素回归分析提示,停经天数、CSP超声分型、病灶体积、血β-HCG水平与CSP预后相关。结论:临床工作中可根据超声分型、病灶体积、血β-HCG水平等综合考虑给予个体化治疗,但早期发现、正确诊断是合理治疗的关键。
Objective: To evaluate the treatment method of cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP).Methods: 127 cases who were diagnosed as CSP in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from Jan.2013 to Mar.2015 were studied retrospectively.The patients were divided into three groups: 38 cases named A group were treated by suction curettage under ultrasound guidance; 72 cases named B group underwent bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization(BUACE) + suction curettage under ultrasound guidance; C group which included 17 cases who were received laparoscopy and hysteroscopy-combined surgery as treatment of CSP.The baseline characters,surgical clearance rates,complications,cost and durations of hospitalization and recovery qualities of patients from these groups were compared,factors affecting prognosis of CSP were investigated.Results: The volume of lesions for these three groups was(9.76 ±2.30)cm3,(27.33±6.47) cm3,(65.82±29.61) cm^3 respectively,while the significantly differences were found among three groups.The serum level of β-h CG before treatment were(40983 ±11132.40) m IU/ml,(76771.23 ±7582.95) m IU/ml,(47010.10 ±112106.42) m IU/ml respectively.Bleeding loss were(48.55 ±16.07) ml in group A;(42.32 ±15.15) ml in group B and(267.65±113.41) ml in group C.Group A and group B were both significantly less than group C,while there was no significant difference among group A and group B.The expense were(5171.57 ± 730.41) yuan in group A,which were significantly less than those in group B(11113.41±405.94) yuan and in group C(18018.40±1209.61) yuan.Hospital stay were significantly longer in group B(6.42 ±0.28days) and group C(6.82 ±0.52days) compared with the group A(4.63 ±0.29days).Multivariate regression analysis showed that gestational age,lesion volume,serum level of β-h CG may be factors of prognosis of CSP.Conclusion: Early diagnosis and early treatment remain the key for a successful treatment of CSP.Different therapeutic modalities may be selected according to patient conditions.
出处
《现代妇产科进展》
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第3期203-207,共5页
Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology