期刊文献+

批评话语分析视角下的民族志研究 被引量:6

Research of Ethnography from the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 民族志"真实性"的解构,使得民族志的"主观性"在学术讨论中逐渐获得承认。此外,学者与土著之间不平等的权力关系,以及民族志作者为了代表土著及掌握学术话语权而使用的修饰技巧也逐渐被揭露。20世纪80年代人类学者对于民族志的反思,开启了民族志及文化书写成为分析对象的可能性。这样的转折不但为批评话语分析提供了一个新的研究题材,也为人类学者提供一种反思民族志的视角,创造跨学科研究的契机。 The deconstruction of ethnographic reality leads to the recognition of ethnographic subjectivity in academic discussion. Besides,the unequal power relation between scholars and indigenous peoples,along with ethnographers' rhetoric strategies for holding discursive power in academia are disclosed. Anthropologists' rethinking of ethnography in the 1980 s opened the possibility of ethnography and culture writing as analyzed target. This transition has not only provided critical discourse analysis a newresearch topic,but also provided anthropologists a newperspective of ethnography,which creates the opportunity of interdisciplinary research.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期19-24,144,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 批评话语分析 民族志真实性 学术话语权 跨学科研究 critical discourse analysis ethnographic reality discursive power in Academia interdisciplinary research
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Clifford, J. 1986. Introduction:Partial truths[ A]. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (eds.). Writing Culture:The Po- etics and Politics of Ethnography[ C ]. Berkeley : University of California Press.
  • 2Crapanzano,V. 1986. Hermes' dilemma: The masking of subversion in ethnographic description[ A]. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus ( eds. ). Writing Culture : The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography [ C ]. Berkeley : Uni- versity of California Press.
  • 3Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change [ M ]. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 4Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis:The Critical Study of Language [ M]. New York: Longman.
  • 5Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge[ M ]. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • 6Foucault, M. 2006. History of Madness [ M ]. London: Roufledge.
  • 7Frake, C. 1964. Notes on queries in ethnography [ J ]. American Anthropologist, ( 3 ) : 132 - 145.
  • 8Freeman, D. 1983. Margaret Mead and Samoa:The Making and Unmaking of An Anthropological Myth [ M ] Cambridge : Harvard University Pres.
  • 9Gee, J. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies :Ideology in Discourses[ M]. London :Taylor & Francis.
  • 10Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives:The Anthropologists as Author[M]. Stanford:Stanford University Press.

二级参考文献147

共引文献275

同被引文献111

引证文献6

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部