期刊文献+

话语视角下言语行为直接性程度标注系统的设计与应用 被引量:3

Coding Speech Acts for Their Degree of Directness from a Discursive Perspective: Method and Application
原文传递
导出
摘要 对言语行为的直接性程度进行标注通常是言语行为研究和礼貌研究的切入点。但现有的标注方法存在一定的局限性,它们或基于非自然语料,或操作性差,已经无法适应目前基于语料库研究的需要。本文通过考察现有的几种标注方法,根据话语视角,以一个言语行为的三个不同维度和若干范畴为基础,提出了一套新的标注系统,然后通过"不同意"言语行为实例描述该标注系统在研究中的具体应用,最后指出该标注系统的应用前景。 Coding speech acts for their degree of directness has long been considered a starting point in speech act and politeness research. Existing coding methods,however,are unsatisfactory for the current need of corpus-based studies in that they are mostly not based on naturally-occurring data or cannot be fully operationalized. Therefore,after reviewing mostly employed existing coding systems,the present study adopts a discursive approach and proposes a coding system which functions on three dimensions and several subsequent categories of a speech act. The procedure to operate the coding system is then explained using examples from the speech act of disagreement. Finally,implications are provided in terms of the application of the coding system.
作者 高君 刘永兵
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期44-54,145,共11页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 话语视角 言语行为 直接性程度 标注系统 不同意 discursive approach speech act degree of directness coding system disagreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Arundale,R. 1999. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative politeness theory [J]. Pragmatics, ( 1 ) :119 - 153.
  • 2Bardovi-Harlig, K. & T. Salsbury. 2004. The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners:A lon- gitudinal perspective [ A ]. In D. Boxer & A. Cohen (eds.). Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning [ C ]. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.
  • 3Beebe, L. & T. Takahashi. 1989. Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts: Chastisement and disagreement[ A]. In M. Eisenstein (ed.). The Dynamic lnterlanguage: Empirical Studies in Second Lan- guage Variation [ C ]. New York: Plenum.
  • 4Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests:Same or different? [ J]. Journal ofPragmatics, (2) :131 - 146.
  • 5Blum-Kulka, S. , J. House & G. Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies [ C ]. Norwood : Ablex.
  • 6Brown, G. & G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis[ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage[ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Callies,M. 2013. Advancing the research agenda of interlanguage pragmatics: The role of learner corpora [A]. In J. Romero-Trillo ( ed. ). Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 : New Domains and Methodologies [ C ]. New York: Springer.
  • 9Fraser, B. & W. Nolen. 1981. The association of deference with linguistic form [ J ]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, (27) :93 - 109.
  • 10Georgakopoulou, A. 2001. Arguing about the future : On indirect disagreements in conversations [ J ]. Journal ofPragmatics, (12) : 1881 - 1990.

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部