合作学习与思辨能力的培养被引量：50

Cooperative Learning and the Cultivation of Critical Thinking Competency

导出

摘要本文旨在探索合作学习模式及其对增强学生学习效果和思辨能力的作用。在北京某综合大学英语专业进行的实验结果显示,合作学习模式主要分四种:整合式、部分、渐进式和零合作/伪合作。其中,整合式学习效果最佳,其次为渐进式、部分和零合作/伪合作。研究还发现合作学习能增强学生的多种思辨技能(例如进行深入、多视角思考,积极反思,积极运用所学知识和创新,愿意吸纳他人意见,培养开放、包容和积极向上的合作态度等)。此外,本文还提供了一份有效合作学习模式表,为教师开展合作学习提供具体的指导。 This article explores the modes of cooperative learning and their effects on enhancing students' learning outcomes and critical thinking competency. Results showed that there were mainly four modes,namely,full-integrative,semi-integrative,progressive and zero / pseudo cooperation,among which the learning effects of full-integrative cooperation were the best,followed by progressive,semi-integrative and zero / pseudo cooperation. The study also proved that cooperative learning helped cultivate student's critical thinking competency,in terms of thinking intensity and multiple perspectives,active reflection,active application and innovation,willingness to accept others' views as well as open,tolerant and positive cooperation attitude. In addition,a rubric to evaluate effectiveness and efficiency of cooperative learning is provided here in the hope that it can offer a pragmatic guidance for teachers to carry out cooperative learning.

作者潘琳琳宋毅

机构地区首都师范大学外国语学院北京外国语大学国际新闻与传播学院

出处《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期97-105,147,共9页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基金全国教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度教育部重点课题"高校英语专业技能课程与思辨能力培养研究"(GPA115061)的成果

关键词合作学习思辨能力学习效果 cooperative learning critical thinking competency learning outcomes

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Amobi, F. 2005. Pre-service teachers' reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience[ J]. Teacher Education Quarterly, ( 1 ) :115 - 128.
2Chen, G. ,L. Donahue & R. Klimoski. 2004. Training undergraduates to work in organizational teams [ J ]. A- cademy of Management Learning and Education, ( 1 ) :27 -40.
3Facione, N. ,P. Facione, S. Blohm & C. Gitten. 2009. California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Test Manual[M]. Millbrae : The California Academic Press.
4Johnson, D. , R. Johnson & K. Smith. 1998. Cooperative learning returns to college[J]. Change, ( 30 ) : 26 - 35.
5Keith, W. & G. Anne. 2010. Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning[ J]. European Journal of Engineering Education, (4) :429 -443.
6Merriam, S. 2002. Qualitative Research in Practice:Examples for Discussion and Analysis [ M ]. San Francis- co: Jossey-Bass.
7Olsen, R. & S. Kagan. 1992. About Cooperative Learning [ A ]. In C. Kessler (ed.). Cooperative Language Learning : A Teacher's Resource Book[ C ]. New York:Prentice Hall.
8Roseth, C. , D. Johnson & R. Johnson. 2008. Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relation- ships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin, (2) :223 -246.
9Strauss, A. & J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory[ M]. Thousand Oaks : Sage.
10Sweeney, A. , S. Weaven & C. Herington. 2008. Multicultural influences on group learning : A qualitative higher education study [ J ]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, ( 2 ) : 1 19 - 132.