期刊文献+

上海市松江区助动车道路交通伤害危险因素的病例对照研究 被引量:7

A Case-Control Study on Risk Factors of Road Traffic Crashes Involving Motorized Bicycles in Songjiang District, Shanghai
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨影响助动车道路交通伤害的危险因素,为进一步开展道路交通伤害预防控制提供科学依据。[方法]采用病例对照研究方法,通过面对面问卷调查收集交通事故组、虚惊事故组和对照组助动车使用者的个人基本信息情况;交通安全相关的认知、态度、行为等问题;过去一年内发生交通事故或虚惊事故的情况。[结果]本研究共调查交通事故组127人,虚惊事故组149人,对照组406人。在控制年龄的情况下,影响交通事故发生的危险因素为文化程度低(OR=1.874,95%CI:1.110~3.164)和机动车道行驶(OR=1.829,95%CI:1.071~3.124);保护因素为上海本市户籍(OR=0.454,95%CI:0.285~0.725);影响虚惊事故发生的危险因素为逆向行驶(OR=1.870,95%CI:1.136~3.077)和机动车道行驶(OR=2.700,95%CI:1.646~4.431),保护因素为上海本市户籍(OR=0.468,95%CI:0.294~0.743)和睡眠充足(OR=0.574,95%CI:0.357~0.921)。[结论]文化程度低、非上海户籍、违反交通规则是助动车交通伤害的重要危险因素。应针对流动人口、文化程度较低者加强道路交通安全教育活动,积极引导助动车使用者改善驾驶危险行为、避免疲劳驾驶。 [Objective] To explore the risk factors of road traffic crashes(RTCs) involving motorized bicycles and provide scientific evidence for developing RTCs control and prevention programs. [Methods] A case-control design was applied in this survey. We collected data via face-to-face interview with motorized bicycle drivers of reported RTCs, near-miss RTCs, and control groups on general information; knowledge, attitude, and behaviors related to road safety; and experience of RTCs or near-miss RTCs in past one year. [Results] The study subjects consisted of a RTCs group(n=127), a near-miss RTCs group(n=149), and a control group(n=406). With age controlled, the risk factors for RTCs were lower education level(OR=1.874, 95%CI: 1.110-3.164) and using an inappropriate lane(1.829, 1.071-3.124); and protective factor was Shanghai local residence(0.454, 0.285-0.725). For near-miss RTCs, the risk factors were driving on the wrong-side(1.870, 1.136-3.077) and using an inappropriate lane(1.870, 1.136-3.077); and protective factors were Shanghai local residence(0.468, 0.294-0.743) and sufficient sleeping(0.574, 0.357-0.921). [Conclusion] The prevalence of RTCs involving motorized bicycles is modified by lower education level, non-Shanghai local residence, and traffic violation. We should prioritize allocation of safety education/intervention resources in migrant populations with lower education level to promote behavior changes in motorized bicycle riding.
出处 《环境与职业医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期361-366,共6页 Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
关键词 危险因素 道路交通伤害 病例对照研究 虚惊事故 助动车 risk factor road traffic crash case-control study near-miss motorized bicycle
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1陈秀芹,金克峙.助动车交通伤害的流行病学研究[J].伤害医学(电子版),2014,3(3):53-58. 被引量:1
  • 2吴兰放."永久"燃气助动车开始替代燃油助动车[J].上海轻工业,2002(1):21.
  • 3上海市政府.上海市人民政府关于燃气助动车限期报废事项的通告[EB/OL].(2015-02-03)[2015-12-28].http://zxc.99114.com/Articlel/6458565_2.html.
  • 4Tweet. The electric bicycle race MPR [ EB/OL ]. ( 2010-10-05 ) [ 2015-12-28 ]. http://www.materialstoday.com/molding-and- pressing/features/the-electrie-bieycle-race/.
  • 5Papoutsi S, Martinolli L, Braun CT, et al. E-bike injuries: experienee from an urban emergency department-a retrospective study from Switzerland [ J ]. Emerg ivied Int, 2014, 2014: 850236.
  • 6Hu F, Lv D, Zhu J, et al. Related risk factors for injury severity of e-bike and bicycle crashes in Hefei[ J ]. Traffic Inj Prey, 2014, 15( 3 ): 319-323.
  • 7Du W, Yang J, Powis B, et al. Understanding on-road practices of electric bike riders: An observational study in a developed city of China [ J ]. Accid Anal Prev, 2013, 59: 319-326.
  • 8Feng Z, Raghuwanshi R P, Xu Z, et al. Electric-bicycle- related injury: a rising traffic injury burden in China[ J ]. Inj Prev, 2010, 16(6): 417-419.
  • 9上海市新闻办.《上海市非机动车管理办法》相关情况新闻发布会[EB/OL].(2013-11-08)[2015-12-28].http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfbh/gssxwfbh/fbh/Document/1350417/1350417.htm.
  • 10Wu C, Yao L, Zhang K, et al. The red-light running behavior of electric bike riders and cyclists at urban intersections in China: An observational study[ J ]. Accid Anal Prey, 2012, 49: 186-192.

二级参考文献26

共引文献19

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部