海德格尔《黑皮书》是反犹的吗?

Are Heidegger's Black Notebooks Anti-Semitic?

被炒作为反犹的海德格尔《黑皮书》其实是其存在历史之思的伴随性思考。虽然谈到很多现实事件,但它仍然是现象学的,其术语因"命名"而成为形式指引性的。沃林由于不懂这一点而曲解了海德格尔。特拉夫尼把《黑皮书》刻画为"存在历史的反犹主义",但由于他赋予这个术语的"形而下"含义同样也误解了海德格尔的存在历史之思,他用作证据的东西实际上都不是证据。一些炒作《黑皮书》之反犹性质的人想在学术话语中拒斥海德格尔,但即使诸如贺念的温和批判,也存在着对海德格尔哲学的误解。

Heidegger＇s Black Notebooks, which have been hyping his accompanying thinking with his Being-historical thinking. Though up as anti-Semitism, are actually speaking of many actual events, they are still phenomenological, and their terms are formal-indicating because of his ＂naming＂. Richard Wolin does not know this, and distorts Heidegger. Peter Trawny characterizes the Black Notebooks as ＂Being-historical anti-Semitism＂, but the ontical meaning he gives to this term has make him misunderstand Heidegger＇s Being-historical thinking. All that he uses as evidences are not in fact. Some scholars who hype the anti-Semitic character of the Black Notebooks are trying to get rid of Heidegger in the academic discourse, but even if the academic criticism, such as He Nian does, is also based on misunderstanding of Heidegger＇s philosophy.