期刊文献+

一级市场定价机制、投资者行为与二级市场交易——一个实验比较

Primary Market Pricing Mechanisms,Investors' Behavior and Secondary Market Trading——An Experimental Comparison
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对企业在上市过程中适用的4种定价机制,即统一价格拍卖、歧视性拍卖、广义VCG拍卖和累计投标制,本文开展了实验研究.结果表明,累计投标制下投资者更愿意搜集信息,但也更倾向于隐藏私人信息,累计投标制下的投资者对一级市场股票的需求最高,且对其所获得的股票的价值评价最准确;广义VCG机制下投资者在一级市场最有动力揭示私人信息,对其获得的股票也有较高评价,二级市场投资者买入行为也较积极;歧视性拍卖下投资者在二级市场上的买入报价揭示了最多的私人信息,统一价格拍卖下二级市场上投资者出售自有股票比例最高,表明两种机制下二级市场投资者过度乐观,对一级市场获得的股票的评价不高.总体上看,信息搜集激励较大的机制,倾向于在一级市场让利给投资者,并带来更平稳的二级市场. An experimental study was made to compare the four primary market pricing mechanisms of uniform price auction,discrimination auction,VCG auction and bookbuilding. The results show that the investors of bookbuilding collect but also hide more information than other mechanisms,and their demand of primary market shares are highest while their evaluations are most accurate. The investors of VCG auction reveal most information,and their behavior is aggressive in both the primary and the secondary markets. In the secondary market,the investors of discrimination auction reveal most private information through the bid price,and the investors of uniform price auction holding the primary market shares sell the highest rate of them,indicating the investors of the two mechanisms underestimate the shares of primary market and be overoptimal in the second market. In general,the mechanism which provides the higher incentives of information collection will give more benefit to the investors in the primary market and bring the stabler secondary market.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期72-81,共10页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目"网络社会中的偏好结构与集体行动机制的实验研究"(71372094) "新生代员工的偏好与信念特质--基于行为经济学视角和实验经济学方法的研究"(71172068) 国家自然科学基金重点项目"我国集团企业跨国治理与评价研究"(71132001)
关键词 定价机制 投资者行为 定价效率 实验 pricing mechanism investors' behavior pricing efficiency experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Jagannathan R, Sherman A E. Why do IPO auctions fail? [ R]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper,2006.
  • 2Benveniste L M, Spindt P A. How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989,24 (2) :343 - 361.
  • 3Chemmanur T, Liu M H. How should a firm go public? A dynamic model of the choice between fixed-price of- ferings and auctions in IPOs and privatizations [ R]. EFA 2003 Annual Conference Paper No. 366,2003.
  • 4Sherman A. Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions with endogenous entry [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics,2005,78 ( 3 ) : 615 - 649.
  • 5Zhang Ping. Uniform price auctions and fixed price offerings in IPOs: An experimental comparison I J ]. Experi- mental Economies ,2009,12(2) :202 - 221.
  • 6Trauten A, Langer T. Information production and bidding in IPOs: An experimental analysis of auctions and fixed-price offerings [ J ~. Journal of Business Economics,2012,82 (4) : 361 - 388.
  • 7Bonini S, Voloshyna O. A, B, or C? Experimental tests of IPO mechanisms [J]. European Financial Manage- ment, 2011,17 ( 5 ) : 789 - 927.
  • 8Biais B, Bossaerts P, Roehet C. An optimal IPO mechanism [ J]. Review of Economic Studies,2002,69 (1) : 117 - 146.
  • 9Cornelli F, Goldreich D. Bookhuilding and strategic allocation [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2001,56 ( 6 ) : 2337 - 2369.
  • 10Levin D, Smith J. Equilibrium in auctions with entry [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1994,84 (3) :585 - 599.

二级参考文献68

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部