期刊文献+

基于委托—代理困境的专利审查数量与质量管理研究 被引量:2

Study on Patent Examination Quantity and Quality Management Based on Principal-agent Dilemma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于委托—代理理论从专利审查单位内部的视角研究了解决专利申请积压与授权专利质量下降问题的途径.在承认专利审查员经济理性的前提下,通过分析专利审查员与审查单位之间是否存在目标异质性与信息不对称问题来判断审查单位内部是否存在委托—代理问题.在此基础上,本文从理论模型层面探讨了该委托—代理问题的解决方式,并对我国现行专利审查质量管理体制的改进提出了建议. Based on the principal-agent theory,it studied the way to solve the backlog of patent applications and the decline in granted patents quality from the perspective of the patent office. To determine whether there is principal-agent problem in the patent office,it analyzed the objective heterogeneity and the information asymmetry between patents examiner and the patent office. On this basis,it discussed the way to settle the principal-agent problem through a theoretical model,and finally offered some proposals in regard to improve current quality management system of patent examination.
作者 周璐 朱雪忠
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期115-121,共7页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"专利审查高速路对后续专利审查质量的影响机制研究"(71273189)
关键词 专利审查 委托—代理 激励 patent examination principal-agent incentive
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Jensen P H, Palangkaraya A, Webster E. Application pendency times and outcomes across four patent offices [ J ~. Australian Intellectual Property Journal,2008,19 ( 6 ) : 213 - 219.
  • 2Caillaud B, Dueh~ne A. Patent office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect [ J]. International Journal of Indus- trial Organization,2011,29 (2) :242 - 252.
  • 3刘洋,温珂,郭剑.基于过程管理的中国专利质量影响因素分析[J].科研管理,2012,33(12):104-109. 被引量:32
  • 4Ross S A. The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem [ J]. American Economic Review, 1973,63 (2) :134 - 139.
  • 5Grossman S J, Hart 0 D. An analysis of the principal-agent problem [ J]. Econometrica, 1983,51 (1) :7 -45.
  • 6Zeebroeck N. Patents only live twice: A patent survival analysis in Europe [ R 1- CEB Working Paper, 2007.
  • 7Wagner R P. Understanding patent quality mechanisms [ J ]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review,2009,157 (6) :2135 -2173.
  • 8文家春.专利审查行为对技术创新的影响机理研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30(6):848-855. 被引量:28
  • 9Sehuett F. Patent quality and incentives at the patent office [ J ]. RAND Journal of Economics,2013,44 (2) : 313 - 336.
  • 10MacLeod W B, Malcomson J M. Implicit contracts, incentive compatibility, and involuntary unemployment [ J ]. Eeonometrica, 1989,57 ( 2 ) :447 - 480.

二级参考文献36

  • 1程良友,汤珊芬.美国提高专利质量的对策及对我国的启示[J].科技与经济,2007,20(3):48-50. 被引量:6
  • 2Jaffe A B, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents [ M ]. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.56.
  • 3Burke P F, Reitzig M. Measuring patent assessmentquality: analyzing the degree and kind of (In) consis- tency in patent offices" decision making [ J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(9) : 1404 - 1430.
  • 4Combeau J. Patent Quality [ EB/OL]. Available at www. ficpi, org/library/07 AmsterdamColloqu/5 - Combeau_revised. pdf. 2011 - 06 - 21.
  • 5Paul H J, Alfons, P, Elizabeth W. Misclassification in patent offices [ J]. Intellectual Property Research Insti- tute of Australia Working Paper, 2008, No. 02/08.
  • 6Lemley M A. Rational ignorance at the patent Office [J]. Northeastern University Law Review, 2001, 95 (4) :1495 - 1523.
  • 7Palangkaraya A, Jensen P H,Webster E. Determinants of international patent examination outcomes [ R ]. Intel- lectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper, 2005, No. 09/05.
  • 8Quillen Jr, C D,Webster O H. Continuing patent appli- cations and performance of the U.S. patent office [ J ]. The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, 2001, 11 ( 1 ) : 1 - 21.
  • 9Jensen P H,Webster E M. Factors affecting the power of patent rights [ R]. Melbourne: Intellectual Property Re- search Institute of Australia (IPRIA) , Working Paper, 2004, No. 31/04.
  • 10Gallini N T. The economics of patents: lessons from re- cent U. S. Patent Reform [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16 ( 2 ) : 131 - 154.

共引文献57

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部