学业质量水平等级标准设定及其启示——以小学科学学科为例被引量：11

Standards Setting of Academic Quality Levels and Its Implications:Take the Science Subject in Elementary School as An Example

下载PDF

导出

摘要学业质量是教育质量的重要组成部分,依据国家课程标准进行学业质量水平测试,有助于全面了解学生在特定学科的学业质量现状,这对教育质量的改进和提升具有促进作用。当前学业水平测试存在一些亟待解决的问题,为了应对这些问题,有效的评价学生测试的学业表现,需要具备科学、合理的标准,这就要求进行标准的设定。安戈夫法是当前教育评测中使用最为广泛的一种标定方法,采用安戈夫法进行标准设定,最终确定出了2014年小学科学学业质量测评的合格分数线和优秀分数线。 Academic quality is a vital component of the education quality.Tests of academic quality levels based on the national curriculum standard can help us to have a good knowledge of students＇ current academic performance.This will promote the improvement of education quality.However,there are some problems to be solved in urgency in current academic quality tests.In order to settle those problems and assess students＇ academic performance effectively on a particular subject,there is need to build scientific and rational standards.Angoff is the most widely used method for standards setting in the current educational evaluation.This study used Angoff as the standard setting method and established the passing score and the outstanding score for the elementary school scientific academic quality test in 2014.

作者刘欣颜刘晟刘恩山

机构地区北京师范大学生命科学学院

出处《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期34-40,共7页 Journal of Educational Studies

基金中国基础教育质量评价与提升协同创新中心的"区域教育质量‘健康体检’与改进提升"项目的子项目"小学科学学业质量监测"2014年度部分工作的成果子项目负责人刘恩山

关键词标准设定 Angoff 学业质量 standards setting Angoff academic quality

分类号 G420 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1中华人民共和国教育部.关于推进中小学教育质量综合评价改革的意见[Z].教基二[2013]2号.
2雷新勇.我国学业水平考试的基本问题及反思[J].教育测量与评价（理论版）,2010(1):4-9. 被引量：44
3Downing S M.Twelve steps for effective test development.In Downing S M,Haladyna T M.Handbook of test development[M].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,2006:3-25.
4Cizek G J.Standard setting.In Downing S M,Haladyna T M.Handbook of test development[M].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,2006:225-258.
5American educational Research Association,American Psychological Association,National Council on Measurement in Education.Standards for educational and psychological testing[M].Washington,DC:AmericanEducational Research Association,1999.
6Bejar Isaac I.Standard setting:What is it?Why is it important[J].Educational testing service,2008,7:20-26.
7Cizek G J.StandardSetting Guidelines[J].Educational Measurement:Issues and Practice,1996,15(1):13-21.
8Cizek G J.An Introduction to Contemporary Standard Setting[M]//Cizek,G.J.Setting Performance Standards:Foundations,Methods,and Innovations[M].Routledge,2012:1.
9Kane M.Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores[J].Review of Educational Research,1994,64(3):425-461.
10Hambleton R K,Pitoniak M J,Copella J M.Essential steps in setting performance standards on educational tests and strategies for assessing the reliability of results[M]//Cizek,G.J.Setting Performance Standards:Foundations,Methods,and Innovations[M].Routledge,2012:47-76.