期刊文献+

卫生系统分类理论与方法探析

Analysis of the health systems classification: theory and method
原文传递
导出
摘要 系统分析了卫生系统分类理论起源、方法及特点。卫生系统分类起源于马克思·韦伯的理想类型概念,并受到艾斯平·安德森福利制度概念的深刻影响,目前包括基于现实案例属性的归纳法和理论概念推理的演绎法两大主流方法。归纳法是从具体对象中观察总结规律,形成理论;而演绎法根据给定的现象设定一系列理论属性,然后将属性变量集合,转化为分类。归纳法和演绎法目的相同,但具有相反的优势和风险,因此需要根据研究目的将二者结合应用于我国卫生系统研究。 A systemic analysis of the origin, methods and characteristics of the health system classification theory systematically. Such classification originated in the Ideal Type by Marx Weber, and was deeply influenced by Esping Andersen' s welfare system. This classification is composed of two mainstream methods: the induction method which is based on properties of actual cases, and the deduction method which is based on reasoning from theoretical concepts. For the former, the theory was formed by observation and summarization of the laws of specific objects, while for the latter, a series of theory attributes are set based on given phenomena, with the attribute variables translated aggregately in the classification. As both share the same objective, yet with opposite advantages and risks, they should be combined appropriately as required in the study based in their application in China's specifics.
出处 《中华医院管理杂志》 北大核心 2016年第5期325-328,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
基金 国家卫生和计划生育委员会统计信息中心资助项目(2012)
关键词 卫生系统 分类学 归纳法 演绎法 Health system Classification Induction Deduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1B6hm K,Sehmid A,C-6tze R,et al. Five types of OECD healthcare systems., empirical results of a deductive classification[J].Health Policy, 2013, 113(3).. 258-269.
  • 2张帅.马克斯·韦伯社会科学方法论的“理想类型”方法[J].山西煤炭管理干部学院学报,2007,20(3):99-101. 被引量:4
  • 3徐艳晴.艾斯平—安德森的社会福利方法论[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,32(4):83-88. 被引量:6
  • 4Borisova LV. Health care systems as determinants of health outcomes in transition countries: developing classificationEJ~. Soc Theory Health, 2011, 9(4) : 326-354. DOI: 10. 1057/sth. 2011.14.
  • 5BOhmK, Schmid A, G6tze R, et al. Classifying OECD healthcare systems: a deductive approach [R]. TranState Working Papers, 2012.
  • 6Freeman R,Frisina L. Health care systems and the problem of classification[J]. J Comp Policy Anal, 2010, 12 (1-2) : 163- 178. DOI: 10. 1080/13876980903076278.
  • 7Wendt C,Frisina L, Rothgang H. Heahhcare system types: a conceptual framework for eomparison EJ~. Soe Policy Adm, 2009, 43 (1): 70-90. DOI.. 10.1111/j. 1467-9515. 2008. 00647. x.
  • 8Rice T, Rosenau P, Unruh LY, et al. United States of America: health system reviewERS. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2013.
  • 9Boyle S. United Kingdom ( England ) : health system review [R]. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2011.
  • 10Schafer W,Kroneman M, Boerma W, et al. The Netherlands: health system reviewERS. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2010.

二级参考文献9

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部