期刊文献+

基于公平与发展的中国省区碳排放配额分配研究 被引量:15

The Carbon Emissions Quota Allocation Research of Chinese Provinces Based on the Justice and Envelopment
原文传递
导出
摘要 在对国内外常用的几种碳排放配额分配原则进行总结和评述的基础上,运用最优经济增长模型估测得到平稳增长条件下未来的经济总量、碳排放需求量,以此为基础对中国各省市自治区的碳排放配额展开研究。根据前瞻性原则、人口原则、GDP原则、GDP-人口原则、支付能力原则5种碳排放权分配方法,计算和分析了中国30个省市自治区2010~2050年的碳排放配额,经对比分析可知,前瞻性原则下各省域配额差距更小,更适合区域经济发展。 In this paper, we have summarized and reviewed several commonly carbon emission quota allocation principles in China and abroad, and calculated the demand of total GDP and carbon emissions under the conditions of the balance economic growth by optimal economic growth model, which is the basis for carbon e mission quotas allocation to provinces and autonomous regions in China. According to the principles of prospective, population, GDP, GDP-population and capacity to pay, we calculate and analyze the carbon emission quotas of 30 provinces and autonomous regions from 2010 to 2050. In conclude, the principle of prospective is more suitable for China which has a smaller gap between regions compared with other quotas allocation principles.
作者 刘晓
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期64-69,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家哲学社科基金资助项目(14CJY032) 国家重大研究计划(973)项目(2012CB955800) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41501133) 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ14404)
关键词 最优经济增长模型 排放配额 配额分配原则 未来需求 前瞻性原则 Optimal Economic Growth Model Carbon Emission Quotas Quota Allocation Principles Prospective Principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bohm P, Larsen B. Fairness in a tradable-permit treaty for carbon emission reduction in Europe and the Former Soviet Union [J].Environmental and Resource Economics, 1994,4 : 219 - 239.
  • 2Kverndokk S. Tradeable COz emission permits-Intial distribution as a justice problem [J].Environmental Values, 1995,4(2) : 129- 148.
  • 3Janssen M, Rotmans J. Allocation of fossil CO2 emissions rights quantifying cultural perspectives[J]. Ecological Economics, 1995,13: 65- 79.
  • 4Cramton P,Kerr S. Tradable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather[J]. Energy Policy, 2002,30 :333- 345.
  • 5Rose A,et al. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy[J].Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998,12 : 25- 51.
  • 6Miketa A, Schrattenholzer L. Equity implications of two burden-sharing rules for stabilizing greenhousegas concentrations [J]. Energy Policy, 2006, (34) : 877-891.
  • 7徐玉高,郭元,吴宗鑫.碳权分配:全球碳排放权交易及参与激励[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1997,13(3):72-77. 被引量:29
  • 8陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 9王铮,吴静,李刚强,张焕波,王丽娟.国际参与下的全球气候保护策略可行性模拟[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2407-2417. 被引量:22
  • 10丁仲礼.应基于“未来排放配额”来分配各国碳排放权[J].群言,2010(4):20-23. 被引量:12

二级参考文献56

共引文献463

同被引文献165

引证文献15

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部