期刊文献+

吉兰-巴雷综合征患者神经电生理特点及其与机械通气、远期预后的相关性分析 被引量:3

Correlation Analysis between Electrophysiological Features and Mechanical Ventilation and Long-term Outcome in Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性研究吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)患者神经电生理特点及其与机械通气、远期预后的相关性。方法收集2013年4月至2015年9月就诊于中国医科大学附属第一医院神经内科的38例GBS患者的神经电生理数据及临床资料,根据病程中是否接受机械通气分为上机组和未上机组;根据Hadden等的分型标准分为急性炎性脱髓鞘性多发神经根神经病(AIDP)、急性运动轴索性神经病(AMAN)和未分类组,分别比较组间神经电生理及临床特点。结果上机组腓总神经近端/远端复合肌肉动作电位波幅(p/d CMAP,48.7±15.3)比值明显低于非上机组(80.8±24.0,P=0.005),AIDP中接受机械通气的比例(46%)明显高于AMAN(0%)及未分类组(9%,P=0.027),AMAN的远期预后评分(4.3±1.3)明显低于AIDP(2.5±0.9,P=0.028)。结论神经电生理检查对机械通气及远期预后有预示作用,腓总神经p/d CMAP比值下降可以预测机械通气;AIDP患者更易发生呼吸衰竭,与AMAN患者相比预后不良。 Objective To study the correlation between the electrophysiological features and mechanical ventilation and long-term outcome in Guil- lain-Barre syndrome (GBS) patients. Methods Electrophysiological and clinical data were retrospectively collected, and compared between venti- lated and not ventilated patients, as well as among each subtype of GBS. Results Totally 38 GBS patients were included in the study, among which 12 (32%) were ventilated. The p/d CMAP ratio of the common peroneal nerve was significantly lower in ventilated group compared to not ventilated group (48.7±15.3 vs 80.8±24.0, P = 0.005). AIDP was the most common subtype in ventilated patients compared with AMAN and undetermined (46% vs 0% and 9%, P = 0.027). The long-term outcome score of AMAN was significantly lower than AIDP (4.3± 1.3 vs 2.5 ±0.9, P = 0.028). Conclusion Electrophysiological testing was predictive for mechanical ventilation and long-term outcome : low p/d CMAP ratio of the common pero- neal nerve was helpful for predicting mechanical ventilation, AIDP was prone to develop respiratory failure and had a worse outcome compared to AMAN.
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期434-437,共4页 Journal of China Medical University
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金(201202276)
关键词 吉兰-巴雷综合征 神经电生理 机械通气 远期预后 Guillain-Barre syndrome electrophysiology mechanical ventilation long-term outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Verma R, Chaudhari TS, Rant TP, et al. Clinico-electrophysiological profile and predictors of functional outcome in Guillain-Barre syn- dreme (GBS) [J]. J Neurol Sci,2013,335 (1/2) : 105-111.
  • 2Asbury AK, Comblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome [J]. Ann Neurol, 1990 (27 Suppl) : $21-$24.
  • 3Hadden RD, Cornblath DR, Hughes RA, et al. Electrophysiological classification of Guillain- Barre syndrome : clinical associations andoutcome [J]. Ann Neurol, 1998,44(5) :780-788.
  • 4van Koningsveld R, Steyerberg EW, Hughes RA, et al. A clinical prognostic scoring system for Guillain-Barre syndrome [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2007,6( 7 ) : 589-594.
  • 5Basiri K, Dashti M, Haeri E. Phrenic nerve CMAP amplitude, dura- tion, and latency could predict respiratory failure in Guillain- Barre syndrome [J]. Neuroscienees (Riyadh),2012,17( 1 ) :57-60.
  • 6Durand MC, Porcher R, Orlikowski D, et 81. Clinical and electro- physiological predictors of respiratory failure in Guillain-Barre syn- drome: a prospective study [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2006, 5 (12) : 1021-1028.
  • 7Ye Y, Wang K, Deng F, et al. Electrophysiological subtypes and prognosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in northeastern China [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2013,47 ( 1 ) : 68-71.
  • 8Durand MC, Lofaso F, Lefaucheur JP, et al. Electrophysiology to pre- dict mechanical ventilation in GuiUain-Barre syndrome [J~. Eur J Neurol, 2003,10( 1 ) : 39-44.
  • 9Uncini A, Manzoli C, Notturno F, et al. Pitfalls in electrodiagnosis of Guillaln-Barre syndrome subtypes [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia- try,2010,81 (10) : 1157-1163.
  • 10Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, et al. Prediction of respiratory in- sufficiency in Guillain-Barre syndrome [J]. Ann Neurol, 2010,67 (6) :781-787.

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部