期刊文献+

银行融资依赖与民营企业创新能力——基于中国企业家调查系统数据的实证研究 被引量:42

Study on External Financing Structure Effects on Innovation Mechanism of Private Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要探究企业在外部融资过程中所形成的对银行的依赖程度与创新能力之间的关系,并利用中国企业经营者问卷跟踪调查数据库作为样本进行实证分析。结果表明,民营企业对银行的依赖程度越高,企业的创新能力越受到抑制。特别地,在高新技术行业,由于企业自身的高风险特质以及信息高度不对称性,银行对企业创新能力的制约作用更加明显。不过,当非银行金融机构持股比例较高时,民营企业对银行的依赖程度与创新能力之间的负相关关系反而得到一定程度的缓解。结论表明现阶段不平衡的外部融资结构已经制约了企业创新能力的发展,对应于理论分析,本文提供了相应的政策建议。 Different from the previous researches about financing issue of private enterprises,this paper shifts the perspective from internal financing to external financing structure,mainly to explore the relationship between the degree of dependence on banks and the innovation ability of enterprises in the form of external financing process. Taking the 2010 China enterprise entrepreneurs questionnaire survey database as a sample of empirical analysis,the results show that private enterprises more dependent on banks are more likely to be inhibited in terms of innovation ability. In particular,in the high-tech industry,the negative effect that banks pose on enterprises' innovation ability is more obvious due to the high risk characteristics of high-tech enterprises and their asymmetry. However,with much higher shareholding ratio of the non-bank financial institutions,the negative relationship between the dependence on banks and the innovation ability of the private enterprises has eased to some extent. Finally,this paper provides some corresponding policy recommendations with the purpose of helping private enterprises to reduce dependence on banks,and weaken the dependent effects on enterprise's innovation ability.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期98-108,共11页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71232009) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572051) 广东省自然科学基金研究团队项目(S2013030015737)
关键词 融资结构 民营企业 融资渠道 创新能力 financing structure private enterprises financing channel innovation ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献54

  • 1Ding S., Guariglia A., Knight J. Investment and Financing Constraints in China: Does Working Capital Management Make a Difference? [Jl. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013,37(5) :1490-1507.
  • 2Brown J. R., Petersen B. C. Cash Holdings and R&D Smoothing[ J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011,17(3) :694-709.
  • 3Brown J. R., Martinsson G., Petersen B. C. Do Financing Constraints Matter for R&D? [ J]. European Economic Review, 2012, 56(8) :1512-1529.
  • 4Bloch C. R&D Investment and Internal Finance: The Cash Flow Effect [ J ]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2005, 14(3) :213-223.
  • 5Dunlap-Hinkler D., Kotabe M., Mudambi R. A Story of Breakthrough Versus Incremental Innovation : Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Global Pharmaceutical Industry [ J] Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2010,4 (2) : 106-127.
  • 6Rim Z. H., Hamadi F. Financial Debts and Investment in R&D: A Comparative Survey[ J]. International Journal of Governance, 2011,1(3) :493-512.
  • 7Trushin E. Do Liquidity Constraints Matter For R&D in the Pharmaceutical Industry? [ J]. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 2011,(4) :112-122.
  • 8Firth M., Lin C., Liu P., et al. Inside the Black Box: Bank Credit Allocation in China' s Private Sector[ J. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009,33(6) :1144-1155.
  • 9Boubakri N., Guedhami O., Mishra D., et al. Political Connections and the Cost of Equity Capital[ J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2012,18(3) :541-559.
  • 10Hottenrott H., Peters B. Innovative Capability and Financing Constraints for Innovation: More Money, More Innovation? [ J] Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012,94(4) : 1126-1142.

二级参考文献469

共引文献6276

同被引文献599

引证文献42

二级引证文献637

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部