基于投资策略的基金绩效评价--以价值、成长和平衡型基金为例被引量：22

Funds Performance Evaluation Based on the Investment Strategies

导出

摘要基金绩效评价一直是金融学的研究热点。本文选取了中国排名前十的基金管理公司名下的几只基金作为样本,详细地分析了基金招募说明书关于其投资策略和投资目标的描述,并基于此,首次应用复制基金投资策略的这一方法,创建新的投资组合、计算其投资收益,以此作为基金绩效评价基准,动态地评价了基金的投资绩效和投资行为。相对传统基金绩效评价的方法而言,本文使用的基金绩效评价方法能基于基金投资策略更客观地评价基金绩效,减少评价的偏差,并且揭示出基金经理的投资行为。结果显示,样本基金投资绩效比较低,其所声称的投资策略和投资目标并没有得以坚持。 Fund performance evaluation is a hot topic in finance. We choose several funds from Chinese top 10 fund management companies as our sample. Based on the detailed analysis of their investing strategies and objectives,we reproduce their investing strategies. This is a new method,and we create our investment portfolio as fund performance evaluation benchmarks to evaluate fund performance dynamically and to judge profiles of fund managers as well. We find that the return of the funds is lower than our portfolio and the managers fail to fulfill the claimed strategies and objectives.

作者齐岳孙信明

机构地区南开大学商学院江西财经大学会计学院

出处《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期155-165,共11页 Management Review

基金教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(14JJD630007) 江西省高校人文社科项目(GL1520) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71132001) 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(09YJC630133)

关键词基金投资策略绩效评价 fund investing strategies performance evaluation

分类号 F832.51 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献41

1Babalos V., Philippas N., Doumpos M., Zopounidis C. Mutual Funds Performance Appraisal Using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2012,218(9) :5693-5703.
2Sharpe W. F. Morningstar' s Performance Measures[ R]. Working Paper, Stanford University, 1997.
3Bravo M., Ballestero E., Pla-Santamaria D. Evaluating Fund Performance by Compromise Programming with Linear-quadratic Composite Metric: An Actual Case on The CaixaBank in Spain [ J ]. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2012,19 (546) : 247-255.
4Cremers M., Petajisto A., Zitzewitz E. Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation[ J]. Critical Finance Review, 2013(2) : 1-48.
5Chan L. K. C., Dimmock S. G., Lakonishok J. Benchmarking Money Manager Performance: Issues and Evidence[ J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009,22( 11 ) :4553-4599.
6Lehmann B. N., Modest D. M. Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons [ J ]. The Journal of Finance, 1987,42 (2) : 233-265.
7Cremers. M., Petajisto A. How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure that Predicts Performance [ J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009,22(9) : 3329-3365.
8Wermers R. Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses[ J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010,55(4) :1655-1703.
9Hunter D., Kandel E., Kandel S., Wermers R. Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation with Active Peer Benchmarks [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2014,112 ( 1 ) : 1-29.
10Solomon D. H., Soltes E., Sosyura D. Winners in the Spotlight: Media Coverage of Fund Holdings as a Driver of Flows[ J]. Jour nal of Financial Economics, 2014,113 ( 1 ) : 53-72.