期刊文献+

创业团队的认知结构与创新注意力:基于TMS视角的多案例研究 被引量:24

Cognitive Structures and Innovative Attention of Founding Team:A Multi-case Study Based on TMS Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 新企业的创新活动面临诸多资源限制和不确定性而失败率颇高,这严重阻碍了新企业加强创新尝试的动力。创业团队作为企业创新尝试的关键决策者,其认知结构将如何影响团队对创新的关注程度以及对新知识和新信息的搜寻行为?具体的作用机理如何?在理论和实践上都还是未解的难题。本文在注意力理论基础上,从创业团队的交互记忆系统(Transactive Memory System,TMS)视角出发,以武汉东湖高新技术开发区高科技创业企业的创业团队为研究对象,运用多案例研究方法,系统研究了创业团队对新信息和新知识的搜寻行为,建立了创业团队创新注意力决定因素的理论框架。本文的研究深化了学界对创新注意力的认识,丰富了新企业创新活动和创业团队创新决策制定领域的研究。 Innovation of new ventures often confronts many resource constraints and uncertainties,and the failure rate is relatively high.This discourages the founding teams' willingness to make attempts for innovation,further to say,they even don't attach importance to innovation. As the key decision makers of new ventures,little is known about how founding teams affect their attention to innovation.Drawing from the attention theory and transactive memory system( TMS) perspective,we conduct a multi-case study to explore this gap.Analyzing the data collected from 6 founding teams of the new high-tech ventures in a development zone of China,we find that the teams' TMS have great influence on their search behavior on new information and new knowledge for innovation. Founding teams with strong TMS would promote team members' confidence,social identity as well as the interdependence among them. Meanwhile,strong TMS also contribute to members' risk-sharing and value judgments about innovative behavior,and ultimately affect the team's attention to innovation. Our findings increase the perspectives of innovation research,provide important insight for founding teams' decision-making about innovative activities,and enrich the research about entrepreneurial cognition.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期225-240,共16页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71372136) 国家软科学研究计划项目(2013GXS4D132)
关键词 创业团队 认知结构 交互记忆系统 创新注意力 多案例研究 founding team cognitive structure tansactive memory system(TMS) attention to innovation multi-case study
  • 相关文献

参考文献74

  • 1Van de Ven A. H., Hudson R., Schroeder D. M. Designing New Business Startups : Entrepreneurial, Organizational, and Ecological Considerations [ J ]. Journal of Management, 1984,10( 1 ) : 87-108.
  • 2Ganotakis P., Love J. H. The Innovation Value Chain in New Technology-Based Firms : Evidence from the UK [J ]Journal o! Product Innovation Management, 201 2,29 ( 5 ) : 839-860.
  • 3Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper Echelons : The organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9(2) : 193-206.
  • 4Hambrick D. C. The Field of Management' s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of A Good Thing[ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(6) : 1346-1352.
  • 5Lewis K. Measuring Transaetive Memory Systems in the Field: Scale Development and Validation [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88 (4) : 587-604.
  • 6Wegner D. M., Ether R., Raymond P. Transactive Memory in Close Relationships[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991,61(6) :923-929.
  • 7Sehjoedt L., Kraus S. Entrepreneurial Teams : Definition and Performance Factors [ J ]. Management Research News, 2009,32 (6) :513-524.
  • 8Huovinen S., Pasanen M. Entrepreneurial and Management Teams: What Makes the Difference? [ J ]. Journal of Management & Organization, 2010,16(3) :436-453.
  • 9Barringer B. R., Jones F. F., Neubaum D. O. A Quantitative Content Analysis of the Characteristics of Rapid-Growth Firms and Their Founders [ J ]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005,20 (5) :663-687.
  • 10Amason A. C., Shrader R. C., Tompson G. H. Newness and Novelty : Relating Top Management Team Composition to New Venture Performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006,21(1) :125-148.

二级参考文献332

共引文献548

同被引文献414

引证文献24

二级引证文献191

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部