摘要
停止侵害,大陆法系是以"请求权"的形态发挥效力和作用,英美法系相类似的制度是传统的"永久禁令"制度。现今,两大法系知识产权立法与判例中停止侵害适用的基本规则和标准突破旧有范式,不断变革发展。在这一背景下,我国未来停止侵害救济方式应借鉴两大法系的制度安排、顺应世界发展趋势,明确制度性质定位,构建完备理性的适用规则体系,增强司法裁判的规范性与可操作性。
To stop infringement, the civil law uses the method of ＂claim＂, and the common law system adopts the institution of＂permanent injunction＂. Now, in IP legislation and judicial decisions, both legal systems are reforming their traditional paradigms of basic applicable rules and standards for stopping infringement. In this context, China should borrow the institutional arrangements from the two legal systems in handling remedies to stopping infringement, conforming to the world trend, specifying the nature of the institution, constructing complete and rational rule application system, and enhancing normalization and operability of judicial adjudication.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期43-48,共6页
Intellectual Property
基金
德国马克斯·普朗克学会创新与竞争研究所访问学者(2015-2016)项目资助成果
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(项目编号:231/20205140004)资助成果
关键词
知识产权
停止侵害
救济
比较法
intellectual property
permanent injunction
relief
comparative law
