期刊文献+

支配权视角下的商标侵权混淆可能性研究 被引量:4

A Research on the Possibility of Confusion in Trademark Infringement in the Perspective of Desposition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以商标权的基本属性、特别是以商标权的支配性为视角,有助于明确商标侵权的本质是对商标权支配效力的损害,进而得出混淆可能性是商标支配性遭受损害的主要表现形式及判断依据的结论。在此基础上,通过对混淆可能性与商标权保护范围及商标支配权的关系进行分析,可以为我国商标法依照商品及商标的不同近似程度适用不同的混淆可能性要求的相关规定提供理论依据,并对实践中存在有关混淆可能性与商标近似性判断的关系等问题做出解答。 To look at the problem in the perspective of trademark's basic properties, especially the desposition nature of trademark, can help to clarify that the nature of trademark infringement is the damage to the effectiveness of desposition by trademark right, whereby the paper concludes that the possibility of confusion is not only the major manifestation but also the judgment basis in determining damages to trademark's desposition. Based on the conclusion, the paper analyzes the relationships between the possibility of confusion and the protection scope of trademark as well as trademark's desposition, in the hope of providing theoretical basis for China's Trademark Law to stipulate different requirement for possibility of confusion according to different degrees of similarity between commodities and trademarks. Meanwhile, the paper wishes to reply the practical question as how to determine the relationship between the possibility of confusion and the judgment of trademark similarity.
作者 曹佳音
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期49-57,共9页 Intellectual Property
关键词 支配性 混淆可能性 商标侵权 商标近似 desposition possibility of confusion trademark infifingement trademark similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Enneccerus Jaeger, Lehrbuch, B.1, 1905, 34, S.87. zitiert nach.Biermann, S.107.
  • 2Tuhr, S.61-63, 133-203.
  • 3[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯著 邵建东译.《德国民法总论》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第514页.
  • 4[德]卡尔·拉伦茨著.《德国民法通论》,王晓哗等译,法律出版社,2003年版,第336页.
  • 5Smith v. Montoro, 648 F. 2d 602, 607 (9th Cir. 1981).
  • 6Lange v. Retirement Living Pub. Co., 949 F.2d 576, 583 (2d Cir. 1991).
  • 7浙江省高级人民法院(2007)浙民三终字第74号民事判决书.
  • 8陈华彬著.《民法总论》,中国法制出版社2010年5月版,第78页.
  • 9J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, Fourth Edition, § 25.4-25.8.
  • 10《美国反不正当竞争法重述》第1条第1款.

共引文献37

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部