期刊文献+

国内外大学评价体系的发展比较与演进方向探析——第三方评价的视角 被引量:1

A Comparison of Domestic and International University Evaluation Systemand Development Orientation——A Perspective of Third Party Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取有代表性的国内外大学评价体系,进行比较分析后得出:教育评价的不同取向表现为不同路径;对大学特色的评价侧重点各有不同;片面追求模糊性或确定性评价都曾遭到质疑;国内评价重视引入国际性标准,而国外评价趋向本土化,主张依据不同的教育诉求和文化评价大学。基于上述分析,对大学评价的演进方向进行了探析:教育评价的价值取向趋于相互借鉴以不断完善评价路径;投入、产出、效益相结合的综合评估思想逐渐显现;以关键指标评价大学发展特色,应结合教育诉求和文化背景进行;逐渐从片面关注模糊、主观或量化、客观评价,向二者的科学匹配转变,建立发展性评价。 Based on a sampled analysis to representative domestic and international university evaluation systems,this papermaintains that,different routes reflect different evaluation orientations.Though university evaluation systems differ in their focuses,pure pursuit of fuzziness or accuracy is equally questioned.The emphasis is laid on introduction of international criteria indomestic evaluation,while localization counts more for international evaluation,the latter of which demands different evaluationsystems for different education purposes and for differentcultures.This paper further probes into the evolution directions of universityevaluations.Education evaluation orientations point to mutual learning for constant improvements.Comprehensive evaluationprinciples gradually emerge,combining investments,productions and benefits.Key evaluation indexes must cover universitydevelopment characteristics,education purposes and cultural backgrounds.One-sided concerns of fuzziness and subjectivity,orquantization and objectivity,should be shifted to a scientific matching and balancing of the two,so as to set up developmental evaluations.
作者 黄岚
出处 《评价与管理》 2016年第1期19-24,共6页 Evaluation & Management
基金 2015年江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目"高水平大学主要指标的国际比较"(2015SJD043) 2015年中央基本科研专项科技创新基金"大学评价的理念转变与趋势研究"课题(NZ2015208)研究成果之一
关键词 大学 评价体系 发展比较 演进 university evaluation system development comparison orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献6

  • 1James Monks, Ronald G Ehrenberg. The Impact of U.S.News & World Report College Rankings on Admissions Outcomes and Pricing Policies at Selective Private Institutions[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No.7227, 1999: 4.
  • 2Institute for Higher Education Policy. College and University Ranking Systems: Global Perspectives and American Challenges[R]. Washington D.C., 2007: 14, 16.
  • 3U.S. News & World Report. Methodology: Undergraduate Ranking Criteria and Weights[EB/OL]. http://www.usnews. corn/education/best-colleges/articles/2012/09/11/ methodology-undergraduate-ranking-criteria-and-weights- 2?page=4, 2012-12-1, 4;3;5;2;4. articles/education/best-colleges/2010/08/09/methodology- ranking-category-definitions-2011.html.
  • 4U.S. News & World Report. How U.S.News Calculates Its Best Colleges Rankings [ EB/OL ]. [ 2012-11-20 ] http://www. usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/2012/09/11/ how-us-news-calculates-its-best-colleges-rankings.
  • 5U.S. News & World Report. Methodology: Ranking Category Definitions[EB/OL].[2010-09-01 ] http://www.usnews.com/.
  • 6沈红.美国大学评估与研究型大学面临的挑战——“1997年美国最好大学”评估揭晓[J].辽宁高等教育研究,1998(1):109-116. 被引量:9

共引文献41

同被引文献17

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部