摘要
利用引用文献分析法,针对在国内医学人文学研究中占有重要地位的《医学与哲学》(人文社会医学版/A版)和《中国医学伦理学》杂志2004年~2013年的引文进行了比较分析,以揭示两种杂志引用文献的规律。选取的分析指标包括引文数量、引文类型、高被引作者及高被引杂志。分析结果显示,两种杂志的平均引文量均少于医学专业期刊;在两种期刊的主要引文文献中,期刊和专著均是主要文献来源;《医学与哲学》的自引率比较合理,而《中国医学伦理学》的自引率比较高。
With the method of bibliometrics, this paper reviewed the literature published in The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (Humanities and Social Medicine Edition/A Edition) and The Journal of Chinese Medical Ethics from year 2004 to year 2013, which are two major academic journals of medical humanities in China to reveal the rules of the citation. A citation comparison was conducted in the aspects of citation number, citation type, highly cited authors and journals. The resuits showed that, the average citation of these two journals were lower than medical journals' journal papers and books were the major citation of both of the two journals; the self-citing rate of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy was in a rational range, while The Journal of Chinese Medical Ethics had a higher self-citing rate.
出处
《医学与哲学(A)》
北大核心
2016年第4期92-94,共3页
Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition