摘要
目的探讨乙型肝炎患者不同的血清学模式、乙肝病毒DNA(HBV-DNA)与乙肝前sl抗原(Pre.SlAg)联合检测的临床意义。方法采用化学免疫发光法(CLIA)定量筛选339例乙肝血清标志物阳性血清,采用荧光定量聚合酶链反应法(FQ—PCR)检测HBV-DNA,采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测Pre.S1Ag。结果乙肝不同血清模式下,HBV.DNA与Pre-SlAg检测结果比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。HBsAg、HBeAg、抗一HBc阳性组HBV—DNA检出率93.1%,Pre—S1Ag检出率86.1%。HBsAg、HBeAb、抗.HBc阳性组HBV-DNA检出率45.9%,Pre—S1Ag检出率69.2%。HBsAg、抗.HBc阳性组HBV-DNA检出率61.0%,Pre-SlAg检出率72.9%。HBsAg、HBeAg阳性组HBV-DNA及Pre.SlAg检出率均为100%。以HBeAg阳性为对照HBV—DNA及Pre—S1Ag检出率分别为87.3%和93.7%。HBV.DNA与Pre.SlAg检测结果比较差异有统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论乙肝五项、HBV.DNA、Pre.SlAg联合检测能够对乙肝病毒的感染、复制程度做出准确的判断,为临床治疗方案的选择和疗效的观察提供可靠的依据。
Objective To discuss clinical values of the combined analysis on serological patterns, vi- rus DNA titer and pre-S1 antigen for hepatitis B. Methods Serum samples from 339 patients with chemical luminescent immunoassay (CLIA) positive results were used in the study. The level of serum HBV-DNA was detected by fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR). Pre-S1Ag was detected by ELISA. Results There was no significant differences in pre-S1 Ag or HBV-DNA with different serological patterns of hepatitis B (P 〉 0.05). The HBV-DNA positive rate of the HBsAg, HBeAg and Anti-HBc posi- tive group was 93.1% while the pre-S1Ag positive rate was 86. 1%. The HBV-DNA positive rate of the HB- sag, HBeAb, anti-HBc positive group was 45.9% and the Pre-S1Ag positive rate was 69.2%. The HBV- DNA positive rate of the HBsAg, anti-HBc positive groups was 61.0%. The Pre-SIAg positive rate was 72. 9%. The HBV-DNA and Pre-S1Ag positive rate of the HBsAg, HBeAg positive groups were 100%. The HBV-DNA and Pre-S1Ag positive rates were 87.3% and 93.7% in HBeAg positive samples, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in results of HBV-DNA or pre-S1 Ag(P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Combined detection on serological patterns, virus DNA titer and pre-S1 antigen for hepatitis B have important clinical values in correct identification of the HBV infection and replication status. It provides reliable evidences for the selection of methods intreatment and observation of clinical efficacy.
出处
《国际病毒学杂志》
2016年第2期105-107,共3页
International Journal of Virology