期刊文献+

乳腺导管内癌伴微浸润临床病理特点分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺导管内癌伴微浸润(DCIS-MI)患者的临床病理特点。方法回顾性分析收治的37例乳腺导管内癌(DCIS)和64例DCIS-MI患者的临床病理资料,随机抽取乳腺浸润性导管癌(IDC)73例做对照研究。结果在组织学分级和腋淋巴结转移特征中,DCIS-MI组明显高于DCIS组而显著低于IDC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在年龄、肿瘤大小、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)及人表皮生长因子受体-2(Cerb B-2)阳性表达情况方面,DCIS-MI、DCIS和IDC 3组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在Ki-67增殖方面,DCIS组中Ki-67≥14%所占比例明显低于DCIS-MI,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而DCIS-MI组与IDC组间比较差异统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 DCIS-MI的临床病理特征有别于DCIS,而与IDC较为相似,对于确诊的DCIS-MI患者,应遵循IDC的诊疗指南予以诊治。 Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion( DCIS-MI). Methods The clinicopathologic data of 37 patients with DCIS and 64 patients with DCIS- MI were retrospectively analyzed,using73 patients with IDC as control. Results In the histological grade and axillary lymph node characteristics,DCIS- MI group was significantly higher than DCIS,while lower than the IDC group( P〈0. 05). In terms of age,tumor size,the positive rates of estrogen receptor,progesterone receptor and HER- 2,there were no statistic difference between DCIS- MI,DCIS and IDC( P〉0. 05). In terms of Ki- 67 proliferation,the Ki- 67 was greater than 14% in DCIS,which was significantly lower than the DCIS- MI group( P〈0. 05). There were no statistic difference between DCIS- MI and IDC( P〉0. 05). Conclusions The clinical characteristics of DCIS- MI was differ from DCIS,but was similar to IDC. The IDC treatment guidelines should be used to diagnose the DCIS- MI patients.
出处 《宁夏医学杂志》 CAS 2016年第4期311-314,共4页 Ningxia Medical Journal
关键词 乳腺导管内癌 微浸润 临床病理特征 Ductal carcinoma in situ Micro-invasive Clinicopathological features
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bijker N,Donker M,Wesseling J,et al. Is DCIS breast cancer,and how do I treat it[J]. Curt Treat Options Oncol ,2013,14(1) :75 -87.
  • 2Keda YU, Lamu WU, Guangyu LIU, et al. Different distribution of breast cancer subtypes in breast ductal carcinoma in situ ( DCIS), DCIS with microinvasion and DCIS with invasion component [ J ]. Annals of Surgical Oncology,2011,18(5) :1342 - 1348.
  • 3Tavassoli F,Devilee P. The WHO classification of tumors of the breast and female genital organs [ M ]. Lyon :Iare Press ,2003 : 3.
  • 4Fromowitz FB, Viola MV, Chao S, et al. Ras p21 expression in the progression of breast cancer[ J]. Human Pathology, 1987,18 ( 12 ): 1268 - 1275.
  • 5Liu Rui, Wang Xinhao, Chen GY, et al. The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast- cancer cells [ J ]. The New England Journal of Medicine,2007,356(3 ) :217 -226.
  • 6Singletary SE. A working model for the time sequence d genetic chan- ges in hreast tumorigenesis[ J ]. Journal of the American College d Surgeons,2002,194 (2). :202 -216.
  • 7Hanna MG, Jaffer S, Bleiweiss I J, et al. Re evaluating the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in microinvasive breast carcinoma[ J]. Modern Pathology,2014,27 ( 11 ) : 1489 - 1498.
  • 8马晓林,曲建军,高红雷,张建友.乳腺导管内癌微浸润与浸润性导管癌临床病理特征对比研究[J].中国现代医生,2012,50(32):58-60. 被引量:4
  • 9Jones HA, Antonini N, Hart AA, et al. Impact of pathological char- acteristics on local relapse after breast - conserving therapy : a sub- group analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost triM[ J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology ,2009,27 (30) :4939 - 4947.
  • 10Boler DE, Cabioglu N, Ince U, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in pure DCIS:is it necessary[J]. ISRN Surgery,2012,132(6) :924.

二级参考文献7

共引文献3

同被引文献14

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部