期刊文献+

政府绩效评估中的“策略性行为”研究 被引量:2

Research on“Strategic Behaviors”in Governmental Performance Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "策略性行为"在不同的领域和层面表现形态迥异,并由此导致行政信息失真和政府绩效评估失灵。政府绩效评估中"策略性行为"的成因复杂,既有主观方面的原因,也有客观方面的原因。通过优化政府绩效评估指标体系、推行差异化的绩效评估模式、加强监督约束机制建设以及构建多元主体协同评估机制等措施,能在一定程度上防范评估对象在绩效评估过程中实施策略性行为。 There are various strategic behaviors in different areas and levels,which may lead to false administrative information and failing governmental performance evaluation.Multiple and complicated reasons,including subjective and objective,cause strategic behaviors in governmental performance evaluation.Through optimization of index system of governmental performance evaluation,implementation of diverse evaluation models,strengthening the construction of supervision and restraint mechanisms,building a multiple-subject collaborative evaluation mechanism and other measures,to a certain extent,it can be prevented that evaluation objects implement strategic behaviors in the evaluation process of governmental performance.
作者 张陶 王锋
出处 《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第2期19-24,共6页 Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金项目"行政精神研究"(13BZZ061)
关键词 政府绩效 绩效评估 策略性行为 governmental performance performance evaluation strategic behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1George Baker. Incentive contracts and performance measurement [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100 (3): 598-614.
  • 2[美]托马斯·谢林.冲突的战略[M].北京:华厦出版社,2006.
  • 3Hood C. Public service management by numbers: Why does it vary? Where has it come from? What are the gaps and the puzzles? [J]. Publie Moneyand Management, 2007, 27 (2): 95 102.
  • 4周志忍,徐艳晴.绩效评估中的博弈行为及其致因研究:国际文献综述[J].中国行政管理,2014(11):109-114. 被引量:23
  • 5John Bohte, Kenneth J Meier. Goal displacement: assessing the motivation for organizational cheating [J]. Public Administration Re- view, 2000, 60 (2): 173-182.
  • 6[美]帕特里夏·英格拉姆.公共管理体制改革的模式[M]//国家行政学院国际合作交流部.西方国家行政改革述评.北京:国家行政学院出版社,1998:62-63.
  • 7马克.霍哲(Marc Holzer),张梦中.公共部门业绩评估与改善[J].中国行政管理,2000(3):36-40. 被引量:130

二级参考文献50

  • 1Colwell, W. L.&. Koletar, J. W. (1984).:Performance Measurement for Criminal Justice: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Experience" Public Productivity Review Ⅷ(3):pp. 207-224.
  • 2Conference Proceedings of the 1993 Managing for Results: Performance Measures in Government.Auston, Texas, October 27-29.
  • 3Epstein, Paul D. (1992). "Measuring the Performance of Public Service," in M. Holzer (ed.), Public Productivity Handbook. Marcel Dekker:NY, (pp.161-194).
  • 4Epstein, Paul D. Using Performance Measurement in Local Government:A Guide to Improving Decisions, Performance and Accountability. National Civic League Press, 1988.
  • 5Fischer, R.J. (1994). "An Overview of Performance Measurement." Public Management 76:pp.S2-S8.
  • 6Glover, Mark. (1992). A Practical Guide for Measuring Program Eiiiciency and Effectiveness inLocal Government. Tampa, FL: Innovation Group Publication .
  • 7Government accounting Standards Board, Service Effort and Accomplishment Measuers. 1997.Norwalk, CT.
  • 8Government Performance Results Act of 1993. Washington, D.C. :Government Printing Office. 1993.
  • 9Halachmi, Arie, and Marc Holzer, eds. "Produetivity Measurement and Management. " (Public Prgductivity Review, 44) San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1987.
  • 10Harvey, J. (1987)."Measuring Productivity in Professional Services." Public Productivity Review (44) :pp. 29-38.

共引文献165

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部