期刊文献+

比较全结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌的效果

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析全结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌的效果。方法:选取54例结肠癌患者,将其随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组给予全结肠系膜切除术,对照组给予传统根治术,比较2组治疗效果。结果:观察组术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量等方面与对照组比较,有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组术后首次排气时间、术后首次排便时间、术后首次进食时间及住院时间等方面均少于对照组(P〈0.05)。且并发症发生率低于对照组,3年生存率高于对照组,有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:全结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的临床效果显著,值得在临床上推广。
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2016年第8期70-71,共2页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1徐秀堂,杨海军.用完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的疗效观察[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(9):58-59. 被引量:1
  • 2刘芳.一次性引流袋在肛管排气法中的应用[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(8):662-662. 被引量:1
  • 3聂绍发,姚璇,朱桂荣,等.武汉市大肠癌危险因素的2:3配比病例对照研究[J].中国公共卫生,2003,29(23):2593-2595.
  • 4Maas CP,Moriya Y,Steup WH,et al.Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands:a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome.Br J Surg,1998,85(1):92-97.
  • 5Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K,et al.Standardized surgery for colonic cancer:complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome.Colorectal Dis,2009,11(4):354-364; discussion 364-365.
  • 6Heald RJ,Husband EM,Ryall RD.The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg,1982,69(10):613-616.
  • 7Dr Mark Hill.UNSW Embryology.Australia:University of New South Wales.2012.[2012-04-16].ISBN:9780733426094.http://php.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology.
  • 8Kanemitsu Y,Komori K,Ishiguro S,et al.The Relationship of Lymph Node Evaluation and Colorectal Cancer Survival After Curative Resection:A Multi-Institutional Study.Ann Surg Oncol,2012 Feb 1.
  • 9Eiholm S,Ovesen H.Total mesocolic excision versus traditional resection in right-sided colon cancer-method and increased lymph node harvest.Dan Med Bull,2010,57(12):A4224.
  • 10West NP,Hohenberger W,Weber K,et al.Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon.J Clin Oncol,2010,28(2):272-278.

共引文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部