期刊文献+

GnRHa减量疗法与GnRHa联合反加疗法用于重度子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜术后治疗的临床观察 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨GnRHa减量疗法与GnRHa联合反加疗法用于重度子宫内膜异位症(EM)腹腔镜术后巩固治疗的临床疗效及时机。方法:将125例腹腔镜术后重度EM患者随机分成4组:对照组30例术后未行药物巩固治疗;单药组32例术后首次月经第1天皮下注射戈舍瑞林3.6mg,每28天注射1次,共6次;反加组31例术后首次月经第1天皮下注射戈舍瑞林3.6mg,每28天注射1次,共6次,自用药第2次起开始加用结合雌激素0.625mg/d、安宫黄体酮5mg/d;减量组32例术后首次月经第1天皮下注射戈舍瑞林3.6mgl次,自用药第2次起戈舍瑞林用量减半即1.8mg/次皮下注射,每28天注射1次,共6次。结果:治疗后单药组、反加组、减量组的VAS评分、CA125水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),但3组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后单药组、反加组、减量组的E:水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);单药组的E2水平低于反加组和减量组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),但反加组和减量组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后单药组的Kupperman评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),反加组、减量组的Kupperman评分虽略高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);单药组的Kupperman评分高于反加组、减量组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),反加组与减量组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后单药组的血Ca、血P、L—BDM均低于对照组、反加组、减量组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),反加组、减量组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),反加组与减量组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后4组的妊娠率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。单药组、反加组、减量组临床完全缓解率分别为90.62%、93.55%、93.75%,均高于对照组46.67%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);单药组、反加组、减量组复发率分别为3.12%、3.23%、3.12%,均低于对照组36.67%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);单药组、反加组、减量组之间完全缓解率和复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:GnRHa用于重度EM腹腔镜术后治疗疗效确切,GnRHa减量疗法与GnRHa联合反加疗法能有效缓解GnRHa的副反应且不影响其疗效。
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2016年第8期73-76,共4页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1Abbott J,Hawe J,Hunter D,et al.Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis:randomized,placebo一controlled trial[J].Fertil Steril,2004,82(4):878-884.
  • 2Kennedy S,Bergqvist A,Chapron C,et al.ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis[J].Hum Reprod,2005,20(10):2698-2704.
  • 3Barbieri RL.Endometriosis and the estrogen threshold theory Relation to surgical and medical treatment[J].Repro Med,1998,43(Suppl):287-292.
  • 4Fernandez HLC,Hedon B,Meyer JL,et al.One year comparison between two add-back therapies in patients treated with GnRH agonist for symptomatic endometriosis:a randomized double-blind trial[J].Hum Reprod,2004,19(6):1465-1471.
  • 5Hornstein MD,Yuzpe AA,Burry KA,et al.Prospective randomized double-blind trial of 3 versus 6 months of nafarelin therapy for endometriosis associated pelvic pain[J].Fertil Seril,1995,63(5):955-962.
  • 6Zupi E,Marconi D,Sbracia M,et al.Add-back therapy in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain[J].Fertil Steril,2004,82(5):1303-1308.
  • 7Winkel CA.Evaluation and management of women with endometriosis[J].Obstet Gynecol,2003,102(2):397-408.
  • 8Bergqvist A,Theorell T.Changes in quality of life after hormonal treatment of endometriosis[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2001,80(7):628-637.
  • 9Lockhat FB, Emembolu JD, Konje JC. The efficacy, side-effects and continuation rates in women with symptomatic endometriosis undergoing treatment with an intri-uterine administered pregestogen:a 3 year follow-up.Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(3): 789-793.
  • 10Petta CA, Ferriani RA, Abrao MS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2005, 26(5):5-8.

共引文献205

同被引文献32

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部