期刊文献+

漂流游客的安全认知研究——基于贵州马岭河峡谷漂流游客的调查分析 被引量:3

STUDY ON SAFETY COGNITION——BASED ON INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS OF GUIZHOU TOURISTS DRIFTING MALINGHE CANYON RAFTING TOURISTS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 漂流旅游是一项高风险的旅游体验项目,漂流安全备受人们关注。基于贵州马岭河峡谷漂流游客的问卷调查数据,采用频次分析和主成分分析的方法对调查数据进行分析,对漂流游客的漂流安全认知进行研究。从漂流安全准备的各项相关数据分析的结果显示,游客对漂流准备重视程度高;漂流过程中行为安全与否不能够进行正确评价;对漂流安全事故表现形态的判断、对最容易出现安全问题的地方感知不够全面。从漂流游客、漂流旅游经营者和漂流旅游管理者角度提出漂流安全对策。 Drifting Tourism is a high risk tourism experience project,drifting safety concerned by people. This paper based on the questionnaire data of M aling River canyon in Guizhou,focus on the safety awareness of the tourists for their drifting actions. Take frequency analysis and principal component analysis to analysis survey data,The result shows that tourists paying attention to the drifting ready-- illustrate most drifting tourists have a common safety awareness. M any tourists can not recognize whether their action are safety or not in drift process. The judgement for the drifting accident and the knowledge about the most vulnerable part during drifting are not comprehensive enough. The article proposed management strategies via the perspectives of drifting tourists,operators and managers.
出处 《云南地理环境研究》 2016年第1期60-66,共7页 Yunnan Geographic Environment Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"跨境民族的流动性 空间生产与文化建构"(41261031)
关键词 漂流游客 安全认知 马岭河 drifting visitors safety awareness Maling River
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1徐福强.基于轨迹交叉论的漂流旅游安全事故致因及防范[J].衡水学院学报,2014,16(1):101-104. 被引量:8
  • 2王新建,郑向敏.旅游社区安全认知[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(4):54-60. 被引量:8
  • 3Thapa B, Confer J J, Mendelsohn J. Trip motivations among water - based recreationists [ C / //Policies, Methods and Tools for Visitor Management: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Rec- reational and Protected Areas, Rovaniemi, Finland, 2004 : 208 - 212.
  • 4Bentlry T A, PAGE S, Edwards J. Monitoring injuryin the New Zealand adventure tourism sector: An operator survey [ Jl. Jour-nal of Travel Medicine, 2008, 15 (6) : 395 -403.
  • 5Jones C D, Hollenhorst S J, Perna F. An empirical comparison of the four channel flow model and adventure experience paradigm [J~. Leisure Sciences, 2003, 25 (1): 17-31.
  • 6Collins K A. Motive importance based on trip outcome, experience level, and group type related to whitewater paddling on the Nantahala River [ D I. School of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation of Indiana University, Bloomington, 2007.
  • 7Hunter I R. An analysis of whitewater rafting safety data : Risk management for programme organizers [ J ]. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2007, 7 ( 1 ) : 21 - 35.
  • 8Buckley R. Adventure tourism management [ M]. London: Butterworth -Heinemann publications, 2010:24 -25.
  • 9Whisman S A. Injuries in commercial whitewater rafting [J]. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 1999, 9 (l) : 18 -23.
  • 10Hovelynck J. Learning from accident analysis : the dynamics leading up to a rafting accident [ J ]. The Journal of Experiential Education, 1998, 21 (2): 86-95.

二级参考文献25

共引文献34

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部