摘要
The uplift of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau happened in a different crustal movementsand different time from those of the collision of Asia continent with the allochthonous India crusto-body, and the uplift occurred very long after the finish of the collision. In fact, there are no direct-ly causationic relationships in time and dynamics, as well as in crustobody movement nature be-tween the uplift and collision. According to its temporal evolution, the uplift happened in anotheractive stage of the mantle creep flow after the active stage resulting in the collision and the inter-ruption of the 140 Ma’s quiet stage-particularly noticeably after this interruption of quiet stage-resulting in the universal Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) ancient platform. On the basis of the dynamicanalysis, the uplift resulted from the multiple compressing stresses in the reactivation stage afterweakening of the colliding stress and the following compressing stress, and after the interruptionof the stable stage dominating the vertical movements and represented by fomation of the universalQinghai-Xizang (Tibet) ancient platform. It was the production of another stress field existing inanother crustobody evolution stage and growth age. In the light of the nature of the orogeny, theuplift was caused by the intracontinental diwa (geodepression)-type orogeny after converging con-nection of the Centra1 Asia Crustobody and the India Crustobody.Because of the big temporal difference between the uplift and collision events, the so-calleddouble-crust hypothesis of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau may not be realistic.
The uplift of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau happened in a different crustal movementsand different time from those of the collision of Asia continent with the allochthonous India crusto-body, and the uplift occurred very long after the finish of the collision. In fact, there are no direct-ly causationic relationships in time and dynamics, as well as in crustobody movement nature be-tween the uplift and collision. According to its temporal evolution, the uplift happened in anotheractive stage of the mantle creep flow after the active stage resulting in the collision and the inter-ruption of the 140 Ma’s quiet stage-particularly noticeably after this interruption of quiet stage-resulting in the universal Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) ancient platform. On the basis of the dynamicanalysis, the uplift resulted from the multiple compressing stresses in the reactivation stage afterweakening of the colliding stress and the following compressing stress, and after the interruptionof the stable stage dominating the vertical movements and represented by fomation of the universalQinghai-Xizang (Tibet) ancient platform. It was the production of another stress field existing inanother crustobody evolution stage and growth age. In the light of the nature of the orogeny, theuplift was caused by the intracontinental diwa (geodepression)-type orogeny after converging con-nection of the Centra1 Asia Crustobody and the India Crustobody.Because of the big temporal difference between the uplift and collision events, the so-calleddouble-crust hypothesis of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau may not be realistic.
