摘要
本文试图在哲学意义上提出有关马克思哲学的当代性问题的若干要点。文章的第一部分肯定了马克思哲学的当代性,并对一些对这一点的误解予以澄清。第二部分从当代哲学业已打开的语境中对马克思与黑格尔、费尔巴哈之间的对立进行了分析。第三部分提出:马克思哲学的当代意义的生成的根本途径在于实际地形成"对话"。
What is the contemporarity of Marx’s Philosophy?This paper tries to give some main points from the view of philosophy.In the first place,the contemporarity of Marx’s philosophy does not mean that it has the same content as contemporarity philosophy.We must clarify the difference between them.It is Marx who puts modern philosophy under certain kind of rational metaphysics.But this revolutionary contribution has been forgotten so long that almost all his successors take Marx’s philosophy as something like modern science.The equivalent to it in western philosophy was positivism. Bearing in mind these things,they reject all the factors in Marx’s philosophy,which are alien to them,and call them religion or ideology.The second part of this paper wishes to make a review of Marx’s succession to Hegel and Feuerbach in the context of contemporary philosophy.From the view of Marx and contemporary philosophy,all modern philosophy are some kind of dualism.In the partition or opposing of two extremes,modern philosophy get its meaning.Hegel’s philosophy was the typical one of modern philosophy.Feuerbach,though made lots of critiques to Hegel,still had not gone beyond this kind of limitation.For turning around a metaphysical proposition,you get nothing but another metaphysical proposition.On the contrary,Marx’s critique of Hegel and Feuerbach can be understood as contemporary philosophy’s critique of modern philosophy.The third part points out that the contemporarity of Marx’s philosophy can produce some kind of "dialogue".One side of the"dialogue"is Marx’s philosophy,the other side is one of contemporary philosophy.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2000年第1期188-200,342-343,共15页
Contemporary Marxism Review