摘要
安德森深入地分析了结构主义和历史主义关于事实与理论的论争,指出了双方争论的实质是特殊与普遍、具体与抽象之争。安德森通过吸收历史主义和结构主义的研究方法,为全面客观地审视社会历史与现实提供了可能。但与此同时,在安德森的理论体系中也存在不少自相矛盾的地方。这种自相矛盾只有在以生活世界和实践为基础的马克思主义的整体视界中才能得到解决。
Anderson analyzes the debate between Historical and Structural School concerning the problem of fact and theory,points out that this debate shows indeed the difference between the particular and the general,the concrete and the abstract.He adopts the research methods of Structuralism and Historicism,providing a possibility to completely and objectively re- view .social history and reality.But at the same time,in the theory of An- derson there are still a lot of self-contradictories,which could be resolved only in the holistic horizon of Marxism based on life-world and practice.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2007年第1期96-105,420,共11页
Contemporary Marxism Review
基金
教育部人文社科规划重大攻关项目"当代国外马克思主义思潮的现状
发展态势与基本理论问题研究"(项目批准号:04JZD2002)
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<西方马克思主义社会总体性理论及其最新研究>(项目批准号:05JJD710126)的成果
