期刊文献+

国际私法中意思自治原则限制论探析--兼评《法律适用法》及其司法解释中的意思自治原则 被引量:3

Principle Constraint on the Party Autonomy in International Private Law——Commenting on “Application of Law”and Judicial Interpretation of Party Autonomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意思自治作为确定涉外法律关系准据法的一种方式,体现了当事人意思自治的理念。但凡自由必有限制,国际私法中的意思自治原则也不例外。从国际私法的制度和实践来看,均体现了对该原则的限制。这似乎与该原则本身所倡导的自由相抵触,导致理论与实践存在冲突。如何调和以及在何种程度上可以摆脱被限制的困境等问题殊值讨论。文章在对上述现状的剖析过程中,兼评我国的《涉外民事关系法律适用法》(以下简称《法律适用法》)及其司法解释中的意思自治原则。 Party autonomy,as means of a proper law defining the legal relation concerning foreign affairs,shows the party's autonomy of will. The constraints can be seen in both system and practice of the international private law. This may sound contradictory with the principle itself. How to adjust the contradiction is worth discussion. By analyzing the current situation,the "Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relationship"in China is commented in terms of the judicial interpretation of party autonomy.
作者 戴正清
机构地区 上海经贸大学
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2016年第4期28-34,共7页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 意思自治 《涉外民事关系法律适用法》 意思自治原则限制论 party autonomy "Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relationship" principle constraint on party autonomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1See Burian, Hungarian Private International Law, in:Yearbook on private International Law, Vol. I 1999.
  • 2陈卫佐,《比较国际私法》,法律出版社,2014年.
  • 3折茂丰,《国际私法研究》,有斐阁1992版.
  • 4Richard Plender, Michael Wilderspin : The European Private International Law of Obligations (Third Edition) ,Thomson Reuters 2009.
  • 5Steven N. Baker: Foreign Law Between Domestic Commercial Parties:A Party Autonomy Approach with Particular Emphasis on North Carolina Law, Campbell Law Review,2008(30).
  • 6Symeon C. Symeonides:Choices of Law in the A- merican Courts in 2009:Twenty - Third Annual Survey, The American Journal of Comparative Law,2009 (58) :255 -261.
  • 7Choices of Law in the American Courts in 2008: Twenty- Second Annual Survey, The American Journal of Comparative Law,2008 (57) :276 - 278.
  • 8Choices of Law in the American Courts in 2007 : Twenty - First Annual Sur- vey, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2007 (56).
  • 9See R. H. Graveson, Comparative Conflicts of Law.
  • 10洪莉萍、宗绪志,《国际私法理论与实践探究》,北京:中国法制出版社.

二级参考文献46

  • 1邹国勇.委内瑞拉国际私法[J].中国国际私法与比较法年刊,2001,4(1). 被引量:1
  • 2[加]泰特雷.《国际冲突法:普通法、大陆法及海事法》,刘兴莉译、黄进校,法律出版社2003年版,第282页以下.
  • 3M. M. Albornoz, " Choice of Law in International Contracts in Latin American Legal Systems", 6 Journal of Private lnternatioanl Law 23, 23 -24 (2010).
  • 4Symeon C. Symeonides, "The Hague Principles on Choice of Law for International Contracts Some Preliminary Comments", 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 1, 4 - 5 (2013).
  • 5《最高人民法院公报》1987年第4期,第3-7页.
  • 6《最高人民法院公报》1988年第2期,第16-35页.
  • 7《最高人民法院公报》2007年第9期,第6-7页.
  • 8" Consolidated Version of Preparatory Work Leading to the Draft Hague Principles on the Choice of Law in International Con- tracts", drawn up by the Permanent Bureau, pdf, paras 2 -7.
  • 9海牙国际私法会议官方网站(http://www.hcch.net).
  • 10Symeon C. Symeonides, "The Hague Principles on Choice of Law for International Contracts: Some Preliminary Comments", 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 1, 2 (2013).

共引文献74

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部