期刊文献+

物流服务供应链环境下基于前景理论的服务选择方法 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章构建了基于顾客期望的选择模型。该模型引入前景理论的价值函数,将顾客的期望作为基准值,把供应商以往的服务水平转化成顾客的感知价值作为评价的数值,再采用加权平均算子综合成最后的评价给供应商排序,最后给出算例。该方法能有效地反映客户的主观感受价值,并作为决策的依据。
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期46-49,共4页 Statistics & Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71401078) 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金资助项目(2014SJB059) 江苏省社会科学基金资助项目(14EYD006)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1Haas H, Brown A. Web services glossary, WgC Working Group Note [R]. Web Services Architecture Working Group, 2004.
  • 2Menasce D A. QoS issues in Web services [J]. IEEE Internet Computing, 2002, 6(6) : 72 - 5.
  • 3Seo Y J, Jeong H Y, Song Y J. Best Web service selection based on the decision making between QoS criteria of service [C]// ICESS'05. Xian, China; Springer Verlag Berlin, 2005; 408-19.
  • 4Huang T, Li L, Wei J. Efficient approach for Web services selection with multi-QoS constraints [C]// ICSOC 2007. Vienna, Austria: World Scientific Publishing, 2007: 349-71.
  • 5Tong H X, Zhang S S. A fuzzy multi-attribute decision making algorithm for Web services selection based on QoS [C]// APSCC'06. Guangzhou, China: IEEE Computing, 2006: 51-57.
  • 6Liangzhao Z, Benatallah B, Ngu A H H, et al. QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition [J].IEEE Trans Softve. Eng, 2004, 30(5) :311-27.
  • 7Lei L, Jun W, Tao H. High performance approach for multi OoS constrained web services selection [C]// ICSOC 2007. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag, 2007: 283-94.
  • 8Meng S, Arbab F. QoS-driven service selection and composition [C]// ACSD2008. Xian, China: IEEE, 2008: 160-9.
  • 9Saaty T. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process [J]. Interfaces, 1994, 24(6): 19-43.
  • 10Tolga E, Demircan M L, Kahraman C. Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 97(1): 89-117.

共引文献57

同被引文献42

  • 1谢宣正,薛声家.企业人力资源管理人员薪酬满意度实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2009,29(9):318-321. 被引量:23
  • 2ADAMS J S. Towards an Understanding of Inequity [J] . The Journalof Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 6 7 (5 ) : 422-436.
  • 3LAWLER E E. Pay and Organizational Effectiveness : A PsychologicalView[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
  • 4KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis ofDecisionMakingUnderRisk[J].Econometrica, 1979,47(2): 263-291.
  • 5WEISS D ,DAWIS R ,ENGLAND G, et al. Manual for the MinnesotaSatisfaction Questionnaire, Minnesota Studies on VocationalRehabilitation[M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota,Industrial Relations Center, 1967.
  • 6KINICKI A J, MCKEERYAN F M, SCHRIESHEIM C A, et al. Assessingthe Construct Validity of the Job Descriptive Index: AReview and Meta Analysis [J] , Journal of Applied Psychology,2 0 0 2 ,8 7 (1 ): 14-32.
  • 7HENEMAN III H G, SCHWAB D P. Pay Satisfaction: Its MultidimensionalNature and Measurement [J] . International Journal ofPsychology, 1 9 8 5 ,2 0 (1 ): 129-141.
  • 8HART D E, CARRAHER S M. The Development of an Instrumentto Measure Attitudes Toward Benefits [J] . Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 1995, 5 5 (3 ) : 480-484.
  • 9BLAU G. Testing the Effect of Level and Importance of Pay Referentson Pay Level Satisfaction[J]. Human Relations, 1994, 47(1 0 ) : 1251-1268.
  • 10TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in Prospect Theory :Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty [J] . Journal of Risk andUncertainty, 1992, 5 ( 4 ) 297-323.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部